http://www.pokernews.com/news/2012/...r-doj-agree-on-forfeiture-agreement-11919.htm
don't know if good or bad - probably good.
This may be a dumb question that may have been answered in the past 60 pages of comments but how is Full Tilt still dealing with DOJ? Wouldn't the DOJ for US only be able to tell them how to act inside of US and once they barred them out that's all they can do right? Unless the site is trying to use the sale to get back into the US then what does it matter what the DOJ says about it?
... the laws are actually intended to punish suspects before they are convicted. “The purpose of forfeiture laws,” Downes laments, “is to help prosecutors fit the punishment to the crime, especially when restitution of the victims or of the cost of prosecution is otherwise unlikely to have a deterrent effect.” Domain name seizures often occur without a trial and often without any warning to the owners, as was the case in Black Friday’s seizure of poker domains.
Perhaps in an effort to stem discussion of seizures’ legality, the DOJ agreed to unfreeze the .com domains for Poker Stars and Full Tilt to allow players to cash out their accounts and allow foreign gamblers to continue playing on the sites. In return, the websites were required to promise to prevent American-based customers from playing poker games for money on their websites.
Our day is coming. Mitt will make it right. After all, he plays cribbage which is a kind of holdem but without cards. Isn't it?
Barry Greenstein? Isn't he a Stars pro? Why would he owe FTP money? Ivey is also a surprise considering all he's said on the matter.
couldnt be more wrong....its a card game...and absolutely no bluffingOur day is coming. Mitt will make it right. After all, he plays cribbage which is a kind of holdem but without cards. Isn't it?
couldnt be more wrong....its a card game...and absolutely no bluffing
Barry Greenstein? Isn't he a Stars pro? Why would he owe FTP money? Ivey is also a surprise considering all he's said on the matter.
Greenstein wasn't always a Stars pro, who knows how far back this might go or what was done behind the scenes. Agree though, it might raise some difficult questions with his Stars rep
Also, the fact that Ivey owes the site money has been a matter of public record for some time now - IIRC I think the story there is that he's happy to pay it back but he wanted to wait until new ownership and improved practices were established before he did, as paying it back to the old owners would have been like throwing money into a black hole...
thanks got to quit reading all these crap stories about everyone and half or more of it is bullshit . they had me believing Ferguson was stealing when I knew he was better than that . although I still do not know exactly where he stands in all this , I can again remain neutral till it's over . f**k subject pokerhttp://www.cardplayer.com/poker-news/12714-chris-ferguson-close-to-settling-with-doj-lawyer-says
even better news regarding ferguson
thanks got to quit reading all these crap stories about everyone and half or more of it is bullshit . they had me believing Ferguson was stealing when I knew he was better than that . although I still do not know exactly where he stands in all this , I can again remain neutral till it's over . f**k subject poker
Charges are:
1 - Conspiracy to Violate Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGIEA)
2 - Violation of Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGIEA)
3 - Operation of Illegal Gambling Business
4 - Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud and Bank Fraud
5 - Money Laundering Conspiracy
Hmmm... as a ROW player I can see a flaw in his argument: Full Tilt owes money to all of its player base, not just Americans.
I respect what he's trying to do (ie: ensure that the money he owes goes where it's needed most - into players' pockets) and I guess there's an argument that Tapie Group is guaranteeing full payouts for ROW players whereas it's still unknown whether American players will get full or partial payouts.
But I really don't think it's for him to decide whether his money is used to pay Americans or ROW players.
you're assuming everything you have read from subject poker is correct aren't you ? I'm pretty sure you have absolutely no proof of your own , correct ? as I stated " I can again remain neutral " till something is proved . I no longer want to point fingers or go with the mob mentality screaming " hang em " . I believe Ferguson , Lederer and many of the other pros are men of moral character and not thief's . I may very well be proved wrong but till then ........So his lawyer issues a statement saying its all good and you just assume that it is correct? What did you expect his lawyer to say? Subject poker's record for accurate statements > anyone associated with Full Tilt.
I just wish they would quit crying about money when they are buying a license to print new money .quotes from Pokernews:
Dayanim told Gaming Intelligence that Phil Ivey, David Benyamine, Erick Lindgren, Mike Matusow and Barry Greenstein are among the players who owe $10 million to $20 million to Full Tilt Poker. That amount was discovered while GBT was conducting due diligence to learn more about Full Tilt Poker's financial situation.
“The diligence has revealed that the financial position is worse than we had anticipated”, Dayanim told Gaming Intelligence. “We do not want to litigate a whole bunch of individual cases against professionals post-acquisition so we are trying to negotiate but we have not been making a lot of progress.
“This is not the only issue that is holding up the sale but it is a significant one. The company has greater liabilities — excluding player liabilities — than we had hoped. The forfeiture would extinguish any U.S. claims to the assets but they do not necessarily extinguish creditor claims in other countries.”
Despite the concerns raised by the investigation, sources inside the company still seem confident that they will be able to complete the deal with Full Tilt Poker and the Department of Justice by the end of this month.
It’s been hinted that some players would only be interested in repaying money if it went into a fund that would pay players back. Is that something GBT would consider as an option?
Some players have said things like that, some professionals have said things like that. I use the term professionals just because I don’t want people to be confused. We’re not talking about the mass of players who have balances on Full Tilt, we’re talking about professionals who owe the company money.
The reality is this. If we are unable to resolve some of these substantial obstacles that stand in the way of the completion of the deal, we won’t be able to complete the deal. If we don’t complete the deal, then the rest of the world players won’t be compensated nor made whole because we won’t be there to do it, and the government would have less money than it otherwise would to pay the U.S. players to the extent that it plans to do so. That’s the reality. We really need to resolve some of these issues in order to be able to purchase the company. This is a significant issue.
Read more: http://www.pokernews.com/news/2012/...orney-ivey-benyamine-other-pros-owe-11939.htm
Read more: http://www.pokernews.com/news/2012/...orney-ivey-benyamine-other-pros-owe-11939.htm
you're assuming everything you have read from subject poker is correct aren't you ?
ok I take back the " f**k subject poker comment seems to be good people trying to get the real story out but I'm still not ready to hang him till it's all done and said . and yes it's a lil sandy here .Yes, everything Subject Poker has said is true. Noah has no reason to fabricate stories. Stop burying your head in the sand because your idol is a selfish *insert expletive here*.