What PM? I haven't received anything.
You're admiring my posts? Oh it can't be, cause i'm such a ....... well, you know, cause since you know what I know, then you must also know that I know what I wanted to type there .
I believe that example with the salt was nice one, It was an answer to some sort of "we shouldn't use programs at all" message. It's like "Use it but don't over use it, or you'll do damage to yourself". 1kilogramm of salt during a day is a deadly doze for almost any human. No salt at all will lead to diseases and death. So there must be a balance - right? What is the correct balance? In case of poker - both online poker rooms and live casinos want to ruin balance of each individual player to obtain manipulative control. It's not like there is a team sitting and observing you to find out your weaknesses(well, maybe in live casinos such teams exist), but in case of online poker rooms - it's just their game of trends and psychological tricks written in code and represented to you in forms of interface, bonuses, promotions and such trash. It's a virtual manipulation, the deeper you fall in it the more promising it looks, you can almost touch the cards, you can almost feel the perfume and sweat of your opponents.But everything is just a gigantic con.
Why it's a con? Any good and prospering relationship in human society is based on "win-win" scheme. Person must realize that his only and single chance to win is if he accepts the fact that he's paying money and time and some energy for the feelings he will be getting. At this point it doesn't matter if individual is a winning or losing player. That's a single subjective point of view where individual can feel that "win-win" works for him. From all other objective points of view 100% of poker players are losers, they lose time, they lose money, they work for a program, they're not doing anything useful for the society in general and for themselves too, statistically online poker leads to real life debts, divorces, problems with law, alcohol, drugs and so on. SO Casino wins, players lose. If you accept the fact that you're a loser - go ahead and catch your quads on the river, that's what subjectively your mind is looking for to give you a fake feelings like "I'm a winner"... Ok Ok, You're a Winner of the pot? no problem, WINNER of the tourney? no problem, WINNER OF THE YEAR? Great, but still You're a loser. If someone is not getting it still then let's have a look at two drug users, both of them are using heroine, one is richer, the other one is homeless, one can have his doze of perfect clean heroine several times per day, the other one is getting some trash portions mixed with replacements. Both of them are feeling like they're winners, but what do you feel when you're looking at them from apart? Do they look like winners? That's what majority of the society objectively thinks about card players. The first step to solve the problem is to understand the problem and describe it as deep as possible, to find the roots and see where this problem is coming from. Whole poker media world is screaming loud "It's not a problem" So LOL, why would some poker fan will ever read my posts, while there is a post written by Daniel or whatever Phil, where they say how shocking iot was to see Nine at the river... Some say that it's entertainment, but once again - where is the balance with this salt? It's a nice entertainment when you're watching a movie once every two months, it's a nice entertainment when you're playing some live poker with friends once a month or three. It's nice to reward yourself with a cigar and glass of some nice strong stuff once during couple of months, but if you're addicted - you must realize that you're not rewarding yourself anymore, you're sick and it's a road of self destruction of your character. It's hard for a human to be his own psychologist... too hard, I guess that i'm analyzing myself through posts of some other people at this forum and lol for past 3+ years it worked for me like if cardschat is some sort of "Alcoholics anonymous" but in the field of gambling.
Can you explain what exactly do you mean by saying "alternate suggestions" ? Can you find these suggestions in what I've typed above, or you had something else in mind?