Football (soccer) is becoming more and more popular by the youth...so we should see some more improvement the next years.
Good post.That's the first step, but I bet it'll still take a long time before kids playing football at every school break/recess becomes a reality. It is a reality here in Portugal and in most of the countries that have top teams.
Then, there must be good conditions for the development of the talent. In Europe and South America there are football teams every where with youth squads and all of them have good coaches, usually former players. Plus, there are official competitions so they get used to play competitively.
Finally, at the later stages of their development (17-20 years old) they need to start playing at the highest level possible and the MLS doesn't provide that. American players' best hope is to impress in some international youth tournament (like a Under-20 or Under-17 World Cup) and catch the attention of an European team that will sign him and keep developing him. The truth is the MLS is so weak, shining in it isn't any indication that a player will do well in Europe.
Freddy Adu is a great example, the guy was a huge american prospect, youngest guy ever to sign a professional contract in any sport in the US, everyone thought he'd be the best american football player ever. Benfica (one of the top 3 portuguese teams) bought him and he was a huuuuuuge disappointment. The portuguese league is only like 6th toughest in Europe and he couldn't cope with it. The following season Benfica loaned him to Monaco (french league). Again, he disappointed and Monaco decided not to buy him. This last season, Benfica loaned him to Belenenses. At that point, Belenenses was one of the worst teams in the portuguese league and even there he couldn't even become a starter. Even Belenenses didn't want him after half a season and in the second half he was loaned to Aris (Greek league).
Of course, not all americans fail miserably in Europe like Adu did (so far at least). But Adu was the one with the most raw talent and that talent wasn't "polished" in the US. Why? Because he didn't need to, he was good enough to tear it up in the MLS! Thus, he peaked there and when he came to Europe he clearly wasn't ready.
Jozy Altidore is an example of a young guy doing better, but even him came to Europe needing to improve. Bought buy Villarreal (one of top 6 spanish teams) at 19 yo, loaned to Xerez (second spanish division) in the first season for him to adapt to european, and particularly to spanish, football. In the second season, he was loaned to Hull City (Premier League) so he could get used to play against better opposition. After this two seasons of experience, maybe he's finally ready to play for Villarreal.
That's the first step, but I bet it'll still take a long time before kids playing football at every school break/recess becomes a reality. It is a reality here in Portugal and in most of the countries that have top teams.
Then, there must be good conditions for the development of the talent. In Europe and South America there are football teams every where with youth squads and all of them have good coaches, usually former players. Plus, there are official competitions so they get used to play competitively.
Finally, at the later stages of their development (17-20 years old) they need to start playing at the highest level possible and the MLS doesn't provide that. American players' best hope is to impress in some international youth tournament (like a Under-20 or Under-17 World Cup) and catch the attention of an European team that will sign him and keep developing him. The truth is the MLS is so weak, shining in it isn't any indication that a player will do well in Europe.
Freddy Adu is a great example, the guy was a huge american prospect, youngest guy ever to sign a professional contract in any sport in the US, everyone thought he'd be the best american football player ever. Benfica (one of the top 3 portuguese teams) bought him and he was a huuuuuuge disappointment. The portuguese league is only like 6th toughest in Europe and he couldn't cope with it. The following season Benfica loaned him to Monaco (french league). Again, he disappointed and Monaco decided not to buy him. This last season, Benfica loaned him to Belenenses. At that point, Belenenses was one of the worst teams in the portuguese league and even there he couldn't even become a starter. Even Belenenses didn't want him after half a season and in the second half he was loaned to Aris (Greek league).
Of course, not all americans fail miserably in Europe like Adu did (so far at least). But Adu was the one with the most raw talent and that talent wasn't "polished" in the US. Why? Because he didn't need to, he was good enough to tear it up in the MLS! Thus, he peaked there and when he came to Europe he clearly wasn't ready.
Jozy Altidore is an example of a young guy doing better, but even him came to Europe needing to improve. Bought buy Villarreal (one of top 6 spanish teams) at 19 yo, loaned to Xerez (second spanish division) in the first season for him to adapt to european, and particularly to spanish, football. In the second season, he was loaned to Hull City (Premier League) so he could get used to play against better opposition. After this two seasons of experience, maybe he's finally ready to play for Villarreal.
Good post.
For the US to really advance imo, they need to adopt a multi tier league system like the rest of the world.
Franchise play off systems are not meant for football.
The should also introtuce youth teams, High school and collegue teams are fine, but they will never produce the same talent as the youth acedemy´s of Ajax,Barcelona,Lyon,Ac Millan ect.
The fact that they use the franchise system also means there will never develope real rival teams in the MLS simply because of the geographical distances between the teams...
Yeah, I know that Terry, Rooney, Gerrard, etc. all played poorly, and I know that in the end Germany ran out comfortable winners, BUT - that can't excuse the fact that FIFA needs to come on into the 21st century.
1966, there was no goal-line technology so there's an excuse. 1996 WCQF a hand-ball changed the course of the game - not to take anything away from the 2nd goal which was brilliant.
Today, first German goal is about 1-2 yards offside when the ball is kicked. Should he have scored anyway - no, unless Terry, Upson and James all contrive to let it happen. But - the fact remains it was off-side.
Then Lampard's "goal" - so clearly a goal. Probably 2-2 at half-time - unless England gain even more momentum and maybe even score a 3rd - who knows? Most certainly, at 2-2 England are NOT chasing the came with 25 to go, committing too many many forward and getting caught on the break. The game changed the moment that goal wasn't given.
Then we have Argentina-Mexico. Tevez 2 yards off-side for the first - and crucial goal. USA had 2 good goals disallowed in 4 games.
How many more BS decisions from 3rd rate officials do we have to see before FIFA wakes up?