In regards to Floyd vs Conor
Conor is under contract. The problem is likely Conor wanting to get paid too much ( Rumor is he wants 100 Million ) . Floyd makes his decisions .... UFC has the ultimate say on if Conor can fight Floyd or not. UFC is not going to allow Conor to make more then the company makes.
The real battle to get this fight made is between UFC and Floyd. Conor needs to be willing to take a third seat and likely will make much less then Floyd and the UFC in this deal. But still allot more then he could ever make in a single MMA match. I am not sure if Conor's ego will allow him to get paid significantly less then his competitor.
I see another issue being who promotes this fight ..... UFC is going to want to ... Floyd is going to want to. They might be able to co-promote and its likely in their best interest to do so but I think Egos will get in the way. No doubt Dana / UFC is going to want to showcase some MMA under such a big Main event.
Floyd is his own boss ... Conor has a contract in which he has to fulfill and can't just go out and fight who-ever.
Yeah agree with all of that.
That said the UFC are insane if they can make this fight happen and they choose not to. It's not like they've got a single other person on the roster who could make this happen.
Will also be fascinating to see what will happen if the Ali Act gets expanded to include MMA fighers. The UFC might be best to make this fight happen now while they've still got power, rather than running the risk of Conor cutting them out altogether at a later point.
Not only did Thompson got robbed in that championship fight, but Woodley did not deserve to win. He was terrible in that fight, Thompson just did what he had to do to win.
Here's the MMA Decisions page for that fight, with the actual scorecards plus the media scores:
http://mmadecisions.com/decision/7832/Tyron-Woodley-vs-Stephen-Thompson
Note the "expert" media scorecards: 5 for Woodley, 8 for a draw, 6 for Thompson. So this is hardly the robbery of the century or worth getting upset over - it was a close fight, in which almost
nothing happened and those fights can obv go either way.
Also interesting to note that the NAC rep got in front of the media after the fight to take issue with the scorecards... but only with Sal D'Amato scoring the final round 10-8. If that had've been 10-9 it still would've been a Woodley win, just by split instead of majority decision.
Round 2 is the only one where there was any disagreement between the judges. A round in which both fighters only landed
eight significant strikes each:
http://www.fightmetric.com/fight-details/dfc8c5161ea0ccb5
When there's that little activity I can't really fault them for scoring it either way. Wonderboy only has himself to blame for not being more active.