Dana will be fine, Conor can't headline every event. All the same logic can be placed on a number of fighters. If G.S.P. headlined the PPV does much better. Ronda , Brock , Jon Jones .. even throwing CM Punk on the card will up the PPV buys.
As I mentioned in another post. All the other top draws aren't fighting for different reasons. It's not just Conor that can be put on the show and it do substantially better. He is just the only option at the moment. I doubt the article mentions that. But IMO it's something that is note worthy on this topic.
Looking at the fights that are listed on the UFC website for UFC 205. ... I don't see the problem with this card. I Think we all just got spoiled by the big events recently. Brock coming back. The drama of Conor being pulled from UFC 200. Nate beating Conor then the rematch. The card isn't even finalized yet and looks darn good if you ask me. I won't be missing this one.
Le sigh. Of course you didn't read it...
The article
specifically mentions there's a real chance that McGregor, Rousey and GSP all headline a PPV before the end of the year, and that each could pull a million or more buys. There's only three PPV headline spots left for the year though, and 205 is clearly the one where it makes the most sense to use McGregor (GSP in
canada for 206 should be a slam dunk, Rousey wouldn't be ready until 207).
At this stage of his career, McGregor is good for three fights per year, but the UFC won't have him forever - he's in his prime right now, both athletically and as a draw. They need to make hay while the sun is shining. If they don't use him on 205 they maybe use him on 207 instead, and put Rousey off until later, but doing that is just leaving money on the table. Have McGregor fight at 205, GSP at 206, Rousey if she's available at 207 and then you're into early 2017 with McGregor probably ready to fight again soon. Why let 205 just be an "average" card when you can make it a big one? McGregor fighting on 205 is undeniably +EV for the UFC.
FWIW, CM Punk was worth around 125,000 and 225,000 extra buys on UFC 203 (
http://www.mmafighting.com/2016/9/1...bers-bring-up-tough-questions-about-cm-punks). That's good, but it's not McGregor/Rousey 700k+ extra buys good. Brock will almost certainly never fight in the UFC again after the drug test failure (I'll be surprised if he even bothers defending it). Jon Jones draws reasonably well, but not Rousey or McGregor well.
From a hardcore fan's perspective I have zero problems with the 205 card either. And of course the core fan base that tunes in for every UFC card will be watching - that's why an "average" UFC PPV still does 250-300k buys, not the garbage numbers that Bellator got when they tried PPV.
Whether or not core fans like you (and I) "won't be missing this one" is completely irrelevant though. We're already baked into that 250-300k average buys figure. It's whether the casual follower tunes in that makes the difference - and the fights on the 205 card right now won't do much for the casual observers.
I find it hard to imagine this doing more than 700k PPV's unless they add someone to the card that can bring in some interest. Even with Woodley/Thompson added to the card it will still be pretty underwhelming for what should be one of the top 5 biggest cards EVER for the UFC.
FWIW 700k is more than
double what Dave Meltzer predicts the 205 card will do in its current shape, and he's infinitely better qualified to judge that than anyone here. The 250-300k figure I've been quoting is his specific prediction for sales of the UFC205 card as it stands right now.
I agree with Underdog, in the normal course of things 700k is a pretty successful PPV. That's "Jon Jones with an interesting opponent" or "late-period Silva / GSP" numbers, not to be sneezed at. I just don't think it's a number that's likely to be applied to this card - per all the expert analysis quoted previously, they either put Conor in the headlining spot and do 1m+, or they leave it as is and do 300k-ish.