TheDude6622
Legend
Silver Level
Which team we talking?
Patriots!
Which team we talking?
Patriots!
I agree, but I don't see that putting them over teams like the pats, dallas, or rams. I also don't think they match up well with the ravens, and I don't think they can out shoot the chiefs. That's a lot of teams ahead of them in my eyes. Any tier 2 team can be a sleeper team, and I suppose Seattle wouldn't be a bad choice in that group, but for the moment they are a after thought to me mainly because their past strength, their secondary, is nothing compared to what it was in what is progressing more and more into a passing league every year.
Lmfao they've played 2 soft ass teams. I'm not saying they have a terrible defense but they haven't faced anybody of value yet.
Steelers were supposed to be a strong team with a good QB, decent WR, and a RB that played well last year. Patriots made them look soft because they showed up prepared when Tomlin didn't.
And now it looks like Brown is done
Theyll be fine without thomas. He wasnt a huge upgrade. They have a lot of young talent . But it makes gordon gold in fantasyI wouldn't call that a bad thing, but I bet they wish they hadn't traded Thomas now.
Theyll be fine without thomas. He wasnt a huge upgrade. They have a lot of young talent . But it makes gordon gold in fantasy
Not having gronk/established tight ends, it's absolutely a huge upgrade having a proven possession wr like Thomas. More so considering New England doesn't even have a average possession wr in his place. Couple that with Brady not exactly being the most mobile qb ever, he would have a target when everyone is covered instead of taking a sack, or trying to get out of the box to throw it away. Gordon is a dynamic outside/post on cover 1, edelman is the route runner. Thomas would have complemented the scheme. They have the guy they drafted, but he isn't proven. I'm positive they wish they could go back and have kept him and never signed ab.
Apparently you haven't watched the patriots at all since belichek entered. They will be fine. They were fine. Losing thomas isnt that big of a deal. They always have backdoor talent, before Gronkowski Hernandez's was the man then Gronkowski appeared on the radar after the case. Is thomas a decent vet? Sure but they still have dorsett that isnt terrible and once Watson gets out from his suspension he will be there TE. Losing Thomas isnt really a huge impact , if it was going to be he would have still been on the Pat's and another reciever would have been gone. The Patriots are a smart team
Lmfao. No not at all. Steelers are "supposed" to be a good team yes. But in 2 games they've looked terrible. Just because they are "supposed " to be a good team doesnt mean anything. As I said the patriots haven't played a strong offense yet. When they do the cheers and superbowl chants can flow.
Not even a little worried about the depth at WR. They have Gunner Olszewski and Jakobi Meyers waiting in the wings. Both look extremely good in the plays they've seen.
It's not about the depth, it's about the type. You're a diehard, so let's have a example. Say it's the super bowl and pats are down 3 with a minute left. Ends up being 4th and long and no one gets open and Brady has to just chunk it up for grabs. Are you going to be saying you are fine with the depth, or that you wish you had a possession wr?
That's all I'm saying, how it played out I bet they wish they had kept him.
Honestly, I am perfectly fine with their depth. Look at where they were against the falcons. They needed that catch by Edelman and look at how he made that impossible play happen. As for the rookie WR's, Bill Belichick and Josh McDaniels are the best at coaching up that position. I do not feel the least bit worried about that position.
The Patriots took a chance at making that position even that much better, and unfortunately Brown came with even more baggage than the Pats even knew about.
We will have to see how it goes over the season. Me personally if I were a pats fan I'd rather have the team as is, plus thomas, rather than the team just as is.... which is all I was saying.
I think we learned a few things this week:
1) As previously stated, the Chiefs are legit.
2) Baltimore will stick around and be a thorn in someone's side
3) Both teams can beat the Patriots
4) If Brady gets hurt, Pats are done. They're actually thin at WR.
5) As a Giants fan, I was happy to see the transition to Jones. I think it was 2 years overdue. Kid, despite a few mistakes (to be expected) handled himself well without Barkley. He can run. He's accurate. Refreshing. Give a few tools around him and a Defense and in a year or 2, Gmen will be back at it.
6) I think Cam will be on a new team sooner rather than later.
7) I was wrong on the Browns....though they did play a tough Rams team and hung with them. Their O is just not as explosive as it is on paper.
8) Gardner Minshew will play Uncle Rico whenever they decide to remake Napolean Dynomite.
9) I will never again trust ESPN analysis for rankings. I went against my gut and started Allen over Wentz in my fake football lineup based on matchup and damnit if I'm not going to lose by the 7pt difference.
10) The Dolphins are like a clown car....just when you think they're done clowning, more come out. Good lord what a joke that game was.
Ravens did show some terrible coaching though. Those 2 point attempts... wtf, those alone probably cost a lot of people their covers. The one where a pta makes it a 2 score game though... most ridiculous call of though the year so far. As for the wr situation in ne, I've been saying it, but everyone disagreed with me on it. They should have kept thomas, at least a few weeks to test the water with ab, which turned out being a quick situation.
YA...that was some b.s. Not sure what was rattling between the ears on those. And I totally agree with you on Thomas. I was a little shocked Pats took a shot with AB given Hoodie's non-tolerance for AB-like behavior. Maybe they thought it was worth a tire kick to see what happened....I dunno. I'd have still kept Thomas around though.