i guess you misunderstood me dj11 sry i didnt get the point i was looking for across properly. i was meaning that showing ones hand in hand history that doesnt need to be shown then they should show all. i hope this maybe is a better way of getting to the meaning across. and maybe i dont know what true poker is ive only been playing for about 49 years. ty for the insite
Perhaps I am still not understanding what you are getting at. The one thing that sets WPN off from what most of us consider an industry standard is that we never get to see why someone won a hand, whether or not we were involved in that hand. Only time everyone gets to see the cards at showdown is if there is only one player who has chips, and the rest are all-in.
If no all-in, but a river bet is called, it drives me nuts that I don't get to see what someone called me with. Even if I am not involved, but an observing the hand, either as a player or an observer, I should get to see the result, and why one player won. I can do that at every site except the WPN sites. I can do that at live poker with the rare exception when a
bluff gets called and a player mucks his cards fast. While it may have been WPN's notion in the beginning to minimize all Tracker effects, the net result is that for the most part even player notes are diminished close to the point of being useless.
Your comment about 'showing all' is the confusing statement.
