How do you measure how often the river card should complete both someone's two pairs and someone else's flush? How often should a straight flush complete for both the bottom and top straight flush?View attachment 250528View attachment 250530
Okay. So according to this approach we are expecting river-level induced draw collisions about 2 percent of the time on any given board going from turn to river. Does it matter how many players' draws get completed simultaneously? Regardless.. This is what audit companies should be looking at, but are not.Pretty simple. There are 44 unseen cards on the turn, and when one of these will create a certain situation, it will happen 1 out of 44 times or 2,27% of the time. Also hand strength is relative not absolute.
On QhJhTh9h a player holding 8h does not exactly have the nuts. Its the same as having Kh on Qh8h5h2h. Its both these scenarios its pretty obvious, that you have the second best hand, so maybe you have to call, but you certainly dont have to raise.
The other hand is not even really a cooler. Two pair is not a great hand, when there is a 1-liner to a flush, and can usually just be folded to any substantial bet. After all nearly half the deck beat you in that situation.
Exactly. I didn't even enter into the pot. But had I entered, I certainly would have been interested in continuing with a straight and then a straight flush by the river .. because what are the odds that my villain would have the King of clubs, right?Excellent post: Although, I personally would not have entered that pot with 8-7 off suit under the gun in third position... Each to their own I surmise...
Have fun at the digital/tangible felt...
Okay. So according to this approach we are expecting river-level induced draw collisions about 2 percent of the time on any given board going from turn to river. Does it matter how many players' draws get completed simultaneously? Regardless.. This is what audit companies should be looking at, but are not.
You do realize that the screenshots are demonstrating what I mean by draw collisions, right? I am not even calling them coolers. They are just examples of how action gets generated by getting players excited about their hand by the river. Both outcomes are possible in poker but the frequency of these types of hands colliding with one another is not measured in online poker.
So here you are nitpicking the boards again instead of the message regarding RNG auditing. These are two examples of many. These two just happen to have that river card that completes a draw for both players simultaneously.The hand with two pair against a flush should not even generate action, as I already said. Why would someone put a lot of money in the pot, when any card of a certain suit has him beat?
Even the other board is not really an action board, since the player with the low straight flush lose to any hand, that contain the one card, which make the high straight flush. And unless the player is completely dumb, he will understand this and not overplay his hand.
The answer is that they don't. The analysis is limited to:Even further, do the 'auditing' entities evaluate how frequently one flops top pair versus an over pocket pair and likewise for one flopping top hole card pair versus another flopping a pair better than opponent's top hole card pair?
There is a hunger in the heart of transparency that burdens many poker players playing online for open source auditing documentation and/or RNG code. But even in that event it would be futile without STRICT and HONEST regulation of the poker software itself and its live functionality.
Take it easy...
That's an interesting idea. Personally, I always thought a poker room will be profitable if all players take turns to win and lose. If a player loses all the time, he will stop playing. And I think no poker room has talked about this- if the results are "randomly" predetermined by some other program that shuffles around wins or losses. Computer geeks might pick up on this and have an advantage over regular players.Can't wait to see proof that this is actually CoinPoker's RNG and not an alternate RNG. I think RNG dealing of cards is random, but dealing of outcomes is not (i.e. selection of the order of winning players is pre-determined). This is probably the simplest rig that is also sufficiently concealed that it will not be detected easily. In essence if players can figure out pre-flop who wins versus who for the upcoming board, then they have the advantage for betting purposes.
The code for any poker site’s RNG has remained top secret, leading many to wonder whether the cards are really dealt in a random fashion. CoinPoker, a cryptocurrency-based online poker site, is releasing the source code for the random number generator so you can see for yourself. Have you ever doubted the RNG on any online poker site?
Is Online Poker Really Random? Crypto Site Opens Source Code, Offers Reward to Test Shuffling RNG
That's pretty much spot on. The cards that appear are random, but the players holding them are selected non-randomly. A poker site can't manipulate the distribution of cards without getting caught. However, they can manipulate the short term distribution of variance with a much lower risk to maximize profits.
Do you not get how a site can profit or how the card dealing system would work? I think you mean the latter.. so one possibility is that all streets of a deal are known before any player receives any cards at all. For example, a random shuffle is completed, 9 hole card combos selected, and 5 community board cards are predetermined - let's call this sequence the deal. Now a separate algorithm sequence awards the hole card combinations for this deal to selected players that the algorithm determines should win or lose. This way the card dealing all looks random but the winners and losers are controlled.I don´t get how they´d put the last sentence to action without targeting cards displayed to that player (assuming its a card game we´re still talking about)
Can't wait to see proof that this is actually CoinPoker's RNG and not an alternate RNG. I think RNG dealing of cards is random, but dealing of outcomes is not (i.e. selection of the order of winning players is pre-determined). This is probably the simplest rig that is also sufficiently concealed that it will not be detected easily. In essence if players can figure out pre-flop who wins versus who for the upcoming board, then they have the advantage for betting purposes.
Do you not get how a site can profit or how the card dealing system would work? I think you mean the latter.. so one possibility is that all streets of a deal are known before any player receives any cards at all. For example, a random shuffle is completed, 9 hole card combos selected, and 5 community board cards are predetermined - let's call this sequence the deal. Now a separate algorithm sequence awards the hole card combinations for this deal to selected players that the algorithm determines should win or lose. This way the card dealing all looks random but the winners and losers are controlled.
The above can then be tailored to end tournaments faster or maximize rake in cash games. Ex. Cooler confident players and nits by dealing them aces that get crushed by sets.. right after they just won or lost in a big pot. Ex. Give MTT short stacks shovable hands but give the big stack downstream from them a better hand that they can't fold. Add ridiculous rebuy and late reg conditions on same MTT.
I don't think there would be a detectable difference on the surface. As long as the overall distribution of cards is randomized, individual results will also appear randomized over the long run, even if they are manipulated in the short run. For example, it wouldn't be a matter of someone's aces always losing, but rather losing big and winning small, at the expected frequency. Where it would become noticeable would be in more complex analysis, such as plotting total blinds won with any given hand by a player over time, and then comparing results between accounts. I'm just speculating but I think that's a good place to look.Thanks for explaining puzzlefish. But seems like you´re saying they´re gonna randomize the cards but distribute not randomly the cards to reward players... doesn´t it break the rules of randomness of card distribution, then?
I´ve seen this indeed when I watch other people play MTT. Big stack is big stack for like 1/3 of tourni then if I watch the cards players get a drawdown after drawdown. Suddenly shortstack because of some quad or crazy river cards. I don´t know... I´m not too long a player to say how often these things should really happen.
The code for any poker site’s RNG has remained top secret, leading many to wonder whether the cards are really dealt in a random fashion. CoinPoker, a cryptocurrency-based online poker site, is releasing the source code for the random number generator so you can see for yourself. Have you ever doubted the RNG on any online poker site?
Is Online Poker Really Random? Crypto Site Opens Source Code, Offers Reward to Test Shuffling RNG
It may be different from site to site. It's entirely possible that table seats are somehow involved and maybe an algorithm has some kind of schedule for dealing wins and losses at any particular seat at a given time. It may just be semi-predictable with patterns that appear sporadically, unless there is some other variable that determines when patterns appear and disappear. This isn't a new concept. It's just not talked about.I think there is some credibility to what you are saying. But I am wondering how it works. I have noticed on some sites that at a given table, there is always someone I will win against despite our preflop holdings, and others that will always win against me. But I have also noticed that if the table gets broken up and that player and I are separated for some time, and then get sat at a new table together. The same pattern does not always hold true.
The simple answer to this question is no....
Its scientifically impossible for a RnG to be 100% random. Over time they will start to devlope patterns. As for poker this is why I believe people believe sites are "rigged" when in all reality it's not rigged. The system is just naturally flawed.
Which leads to another discussion....
Poker Stars has developed technology to make the most random RnG ever created. Which is still only around 98% random. With that said, US players are banned from playing there. Why is that? The safest, more realistic site to play on is actually banned... while sites like ACR and Global continue to run in the US with obvious issues with RnG.
Now dont get me wrong, I'm a very profitable player on Global, and a break even player on ACR. I play the same way on both, and I also agree that to larger fields, and tougher competition on ACR does contribute. Granted the beats I take on ACR and Global are extreamly unrealistic in comparison to how often they happen. That goes for giving them and taking them.