Greetings, and thanks for the invitation to answer your queries and get some closure on this player’s case. As you know, the player IS being paid his winnings as and when requested by the player.
As you know, poker is new to our operation. As you’re probably also aware, BetOnline is the fastest growing sportsbook in the US.
On the back of this, our Player Services organization has been occasionally overwhelmed, but learning as we go and we’ve been setting up our poker fraud team as part of our overall security group. There HAS been some confusion between the fraud team and player services as to who and when should be in touch with players, as well as what information is available to the front-line PS agents, hence the problems in communications to the player. There were also issues with the policy on what HHs we can release and what we cannot, and some unacceptable delays in generating and evaluating the reports. This case suffered from all of these.
To correct those deficiencies, we have initiated several new policies and processes:
1. Any player suspected of chip dumping or other fraudulent activities will be contacted as soon as the investigation starts.
2. We can release a player’s hand history but we cannot release history involving other players unless those other players agree to it.
3. We’ve significantly added to the poker fraud team with very experienced personnel who are available 24/7 for escalated cases to ensure a quick turnaround on any investigation.
4. Our fraud team will produce a full report at the end of the investigation which will be available to Player Services agents who will manage all player communications. This will have all information relating to the case including risk management information and hand histories.
So mea culpa. The player was wrongly accused of violating our rules by our poker fraud team – who should and do know better. When the player challenged the decision, we too challenged the poker fraud team to substantiate it. And we turned to additional poker experts to review it so we would be 100% sure that he WAS in violation of our rules, or 100% sure that he was NOT. The fraud team got it wrong: he was not in violation.
The player will be paid as requested and the processes and policies above will hopefully ensure a similar situation does not re-occur.