dmorris68
Legend
Loyaler
I think they're demanding that any Federal statutes cannot impinge upon the tribes' sovereignty and rights as they already exist.
Tribes' sovereignty only applying to their lands (reservations). If they wanted to run a reservation-only online poker room, I think they could already do that today unless forbidden by state law (states & local jurisdictions can still legislate what reservations can do, such as alcohol sales, gambling limits, table games, etc.). They just couldn't extend access to it beyond the reservation because they don't have sovereignty beyond their borders, so it wouldn't be a very practical application.
If Federal legislation passes, it will open up access across borders (states and reservations) but may impose restrictions that the tribes are not willing to accept given their sovereign nature. That's my interpretation anyway. I don't see it as an attempt to grab all rights to online poker for themselves.
Tribes' sovereignty only applying to their lands (reservations). If they wanted to run a reservation-only online poker room, I think they could already do that today unless forbidden by state law (states & local jurisdictions can still legislate what reservations can do, such as alcohol sales, gambling limits, table games, etc.). They just couldn't extend access to it beyond the reservation because they don't have sovereignty beyond their borders, so it wouldn't be a very practical application.
If Federal legislation passes, it will open up access across borders (states and reservations) but may impose restrictions that the tribes are not willing to accept given their sovereign nature. That's my interpretation anyway. I don't see it as an attempt to grab all rights to online poker for themselves.