I confess that I get apprehensive when I c-bet on very connected boards. So, I'm not sure what size I should do in this kind of situation.Should You C-Bet is a question we all ask ourselves in every game or session we play.
If you have not yet read Day 8 and watched the video for Day 8 - take a few minutes now to do that and then come back here to discuss it:
Should You C-Bet
Collin refers to c-betting as the easiest way to win a pot.But there are times we need to refrain and he walks us through these situations.
Answer the questions at the end of the course and take the quiz. Let's discuss c-betting in this thread and Collin and Katie will be joining us to answer your questions.
Good remarks. I'm going to use your line of reasoning.Hi fellow CCers,
C-Betting is an area that I am trying to get the hang of and glad that it is addressed in the book in a way that makes sense. The other side is application and I hope my understanding is reflected. Either way, the feedback from discussion will be great and is welcomed.
I am really glad when my c-bet works and sometimes have to give up when checked raised or villain takes the initiative away from me on later streets. However, C-betting still remains an interesting area to navigate as no poker player wants to keep donating money to villains.
Response to video question:
Hand 1:
I would not C-bet since there are so many opponents in the hand. The chance of one of them connecting or having a strong draw is huge. Anyone with two spades, 9T, AQ, AT, Kx, Jx and the like has reason to stay in the hand. To apply one of the things mentioned earlier, "I have zero fold equity" in this spot.
Hand 2:
I would C-bet this hand since it is somewhat dry rainbow type and very likely that villain will give up on the hand if he did not connect. My hand can fall into a semi-bluff category, with the inside straight draw and can improve. Although I do not intend on firing a bet on each street, I will take one stab at a C-bet and check it down there after, probably calling min bets from villain if he takes the initiative.
Nice tough everyday spots in the example. Fingers crossed now and let us hear what the video and masses have to say.
By the way, so far I have made two final tables 6th and 8th, won one 990 .01 S&G and made it in the money a few times. My deep finishes have definitely improved. Unfortunately, my successes in the CC freeroll has not improved much but I intend to change that. In my defense, my aggression has met up with some incredible luck for villain. I take that as my downswing and look forward to my rocketing to the top.
Having lots of fun here guys. Kudos to you all!
I can say for myself that I am still recreational.I really enjoyed this lesson. It all made sense. I particularly enjoyed the discussion about how your game varies depending on whether your opponent is recreational or regular. That got me thinking though. Are Cardschat players recreational or regular?
I noticed that Collin suggested several times during this course that settling bets with gutshot draws is the correct move. This kind of amazes me, since the odds of winning with a gutshot are very low if I understood correctly. I will be looking for some specific examples of this in future lessons.
Oh yeah, you should C-Bet. But know how and when to do it:Should You C-Bet is a question we all ask ourselves in every game or session we play.
If you have not yet read Day 8 and watched the video for Day 8 - take a few minutes now to do that and then come back here to discuss it:
Should You C-Bet
Collin refers to c-betting as the easiest way to win a pot.But there are times we need to refrain and he walks us through these situations.
Answer the questions at the end of the course and take the quiz. Let's discuss c-betting in this thread and Collin and Katie will be joining us to answer your questions.