Jagsti
I'm sweet enough!
Silver Level
It also depends on how often Jay flats these 3-bets oop and how often he likes to float c-bets
I'm not oop, last time I looked .
It also depends on how often Jay flats these 3-bets oop and how often he likes to float c-bets
so jay called flop and raised over a huge turn bet with a flush draw?
why wouldn't he raise the flop (getting more FE, and having more equity as is)?
i think jay's line makes a lot more sense with hands that were strong on the flop (such as two pairs, sets, straight, AA/KK) since he called the flop bet (presumably to allow villain to continue bluffing and to prevent raising him off weaker made hands) and is now jamming the turn, giving villain a reasonable price to call with overpairs.
it's like, if you're just snapping off with any overpair in villain's spot here (on the turn), you're getting completely pwned by people who will raise their draws on the flop and will raise their strong made hands on the turn, because you're putting them on draws they never have when you snap off the turn shove, whereas in reality you're getting it in against their really strong made range (that you have little equity against), and really rare bluffs (which is what makes this bluff pretty good imo). i think a lot of half decent regs will play only strong made hands exactly the way jay did, making jay's bluff so believable to me.
just saying 'it looks like a flush draw' doesnt make much sense unless you actually think about what hands he can have, you can't just say, 'he has spades', you have to think what spades are in his range that he isnt going to jam flop with, things like the aqss have overcards + spades, 79, 89, 9T, 9J all jam flop with pair + spades, 24, 23, 34 all jam flop with combo draw. the only real possible flush draw hands that he maybe wouldnt jam are jt, qt and qj. But shoving them over what looks like a 'im committed' turn bet wouldnt be the best play as opposed to jamming flop
I'm not oop, last time I looked .
different days, different shaped lines, different number of hands, different amount won, different values on x and y axis
i dont like u
You talking about the guy that traded usless stuff for other useless stuff until he had a house or something?You guys hear about that guy "who turned" (love that phrase) $100 into like 65k?
ya srsly what are we meant to be looking at in the garfs
solid start
Party Poker, $1/$2 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 8 Players
Hand History Converter by Stoxpoker
MP3: $462.60 (231.3 bb)
CO: $127.40 (63.7 bb)
Hero (BTN): $217.40 (108.7 bb)
SB: $270.15 (135.1 bb)
BB: $49.80 (24.9 bb)
UTG+2: $331.40 (165.7 bb)
MP1: $35.05 (17.5 bb)
MP2: $210.45 (105.2 bb)
Pre-Flop: Hero is BTN with QQ
4 folds, CO raises to $5, Hero calls $5, 2 folds
Flop: ($13) AAQ(2 players)
CO checks, Hero bets $8, CO calls $8
Turn: ($29) 9(2 players)
CO checks, Hero bets $21, CO calls $21
River: ($71) A(2 players)
CO bets $44, Hero calls $44
Results: $159 pot ($3 rake)
CO showed 8A(four of a kind, Aces) and won $156 ($78 net)
Hero mucked QQ(a full house, Aces full of Queens) and lost (-$78 net)
completely leveled myself on river thinking villain would know zeebo and would shove river with an ace
lulz, timed this shot well
Party Poker, $1/$2 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 9 Players
Hand History Converter by Stoxpoker
SB: $327.20 (163.6 bb)
Hero (BB): $195.60 (97.8 bb)
UTG+1: $104.90 (52.5 bb)
UTG+2: $224.60 (112.3 bb)
MP1: $200 (100 bb)
MP2: $169 (84.5 bb)
MP3: $193.35 (96.7 bb)
CO: $187.60 (93.8 bb)
BTN: $132.52 (66.3 bb)
Pre-Flop: Hero is BB with AQ
6 folds, BTN raises to $7, SB folds, Hero raises to $22, BTN calls $15
Flop: ($45) Q29(2 players)
Hero bets $29, BTN calls $29
Turn: ($103) J(2 players)
Hero bets $91, BTN calls $81.52
River: ($266.04) 8(2 players)
Results: $266.04 pot ($3.00 rake)
Hero showed AQ(a pair of Queens) and lost (-$132.52 net)
BTN showed 9Q(two pairs, Queens and Nines) and won $263.04 ($130.52 net)
jinxed my run goot