If u dont believe there is nothing to gain by rigging pokersites and allowing certain players to win hands they shouldnt , you are so wrong. I have played
online poker for well over 5 years and have seen the worse of the worse. I can't say they rig certain hands in certain situations but i can say that garbage players seem to get rewarded more often than not. Think about it, someone brought this up earlier, if a site keeps making bad players lose, theyre going to take their money out and not play there. But when these players catch in certain situations, like 2 or 3 outers constantly it gives the player a false sense of security that they are winning on skill and will eventually play higher stakes and so on. This is just an example of this, heres the scenario: An average or even below average player is losing more frequently than winning and he's playing say a nickel table or ten cent table. He has a hand with some outs but is a huge underdog in a larger pot. The player hits one of his few outs and wins a huge pot;for his
bankroll anyway. What is the first thing this player is going to do now that his bankroll is above his average. Hes going to go to higher stakes, thats what most will do anyway. Now that he's on higher stakes he will have his raked hand amounts increase, when he runs out of luck on hands he shouldnt play he will still be at a medium on money where he can still afford to play the higher stakes when he's down and they are making much more off him now. Think about it, one of the most common mistakes in poker is when ur losing that ppl will try to win it all back at once. When these players go down quick like that, they give the sites no opportunity to collect of raked hands or buy ins , etc. It may be a strange theory , not conspiracy lol, but it does make sense.
Well, in regards to bringing up rigging hands and whatever i honestly dare someone who plays on
pokerstars to bring this to their attention. If you are lucky you will run into a support person who is in a good mood and will only get a harassing warning. I personally know of 4 people that have been permanently banned from the site for questioning the site about their "random hand" stuff. Luckily none of them lost a great deal of money and got out quick but you will never find more bad beats than pokerstars and i dont think its just the peoples style of play. I witnessed people with one outs on str8 flush draws catch( my buddy who got banned from the site was victim to this), and this was at a $5/10 table. There was 215 dollars in the pot after many preflop raises and he flops the nut flush and the horrible player who chases calls the all in after the flop and river is 6 of diamonds. I know there is always the small percentage but when you lose out on a pot that was well over 350 dollars u tend to get mad, so dont tell me that these sites give u explanations and tell you its random, because they give none and get rid of ppl who question. Sounds kinda like the Nazis huh, obey and follow or youre done for.
One more thing to add on to my response which is now considered a short story, is it just me or does it seem like since the popularity of poker and t.v. has gone up so hasnt the "river beats". Come on now, i know its just the fifth card but think about one thing, if someone knows they are beat on the flop and fold right away, what excitement is that. They want to give you strong hands to start and make sure you have outs so that u stick in the hand and keep contributing money. We all know the more money in the pot, the higher the rake. What fun would anyone have if hands never went down to the river, none so u tend to get unusually strong starting hands and seem to lose more often than not.