So against my better judgement, I did some reading on the actual case. This article is pretty helpful if anyone is interested:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-02-21/alexander-krushelnitsky-curling-why-would-curler-dop/9470276
Some basic facts:
- The athlete who failed the test, Alexander Krushelnitsky, was part of the bronze medal winning team in the mixed curling event
- The drug he tested positive for was meldonium, the same drug that famously got Maria Sharapova a 15-month ban from professional tennis in 2016
- Meldonium "could have a positive effect on an athlete's stamina and concentration". Increased stamina and (especially) concentration would certainly be helpful in curling. And even if it didn't help his performance, it's still a drug on the banned substance list.
So with those facts in mind...
as it became known, it was a one-time reception two weeks before the Olympics, and you want to say that he deliberately took doping in the Olympic Games? Here you have the same rules for everyone. this action is a provocation, can not play fair with us, and we have waited for meanness, but this is not within any framework goes.
I'm not sure what you're getting at here. Which one of the following are you suggesting?
1. Are you claiming the athlete
didn't take the drug, and the IOC/WADA faked his test results? Or...
2. Are you just claiming he was unfairly targeted for testing? Or...
3. Are you buying into the possible "somebody spiked my drink" defense?
If it's the first one, that's a very serious allegation. I'd be very surprised if it's true though, given they've allowed other Russian athletes who have passed their tests to compete.
You simply cannot claim or complain about the second one.
The guy won a medal. All medal winners get tested. They even have their samples saved so they can be tested again down the track when detection technologies improve - plenty of athletes have been stripped of medals years after they won them because of this.
So this wasn't some unfair targeting of random drug testing - and even if it were, it's still the athlete's responsibility to pass those tests by
not having drugs in their system. They know the rules, they know it's possible that they're going to be randomly tested, and that they're
definitely going to be tested if they win a medal. So if they fail a test they've really got nobody to blame but themselves.
And if it's the third one, the drink spiking defense, they'll need to provide some pretty compelling evidence to prove it. It's possible, but the IOC and WADA have a long history of holding athletes accountable for what goes into their bodies. Otherwise
everybody would claim drink spiking.