Conor vs Aldo is ranked #2 on the most stupid match up. One dimensional fighter, hasn't fought a top contender. Only delusional irish fans think that clown has a chance.
Haters gonna hate
Seriously though, if you look at it from a sporting perspective it makes sense. Aldo has to fight
someone, and he's already crushed
everyone else in the division ranked above McGregor in the past two years - more than once, in the case of Chad Mendes. Frankie Edgar is the only guy in the group who has a valid case for a rematch, but as we discussed above, nobody really believes Aldo-Edgar II would yield a different result to their first fight.
McGregor, on the other hand, has won five straight fights in the UFC (13 straight if you include non-UFC matches too), against increasingly tough opposition. Have the UFC been choosing his matchups carefully so he doesn't have to fight any wrestlers? Sure. But like I've said before, this is the fight
business, they'd be stupid to risk what is sure to be the biggest payday for the lighter weight classes since BJ Penn just to "prove" that McGregor could maybe beat a wrestler, or so that his haters could crow that he wasn't able to defend a takedown or something.
Speaking of one dimensional BTW, you know who else is pretty one-dimensional? Jose Aldo. He's got a 25-1 record, only
two of those wins came by submission, and of those, one was a "submission by soccer kicks"! The other was a choke in his third ever fight. So he has exactly as many "proper" submission victories as McGregor has: one.
Aldo is a striker. Which is why I'm not particularly concerned that McGregor hasn't had to face a wrestler on his path to the title shot: it's not like the champion is a wrestler himself and he needs to beat one to prove he's got a chance against the champ. No. The title fight is gonna basically be a kickboxing match.
I honestly thought that the Gustafsson vs. Jones fight was going to end in a KO/TKO but it didn't. This fight my thoughts are the same. It should end in one & most likely from Rumble.
Yeah, Jones has really gone the way of a lot of champions, eschewing finishes in favour of decisions because (one assumes) he doesn't want to take the extra risks with the belt on the line. And it makes sense too that he's fighting better opponents now than when he was first coming up, so they'll be harder to finish.
Fingers crossed for fireworks in the Gus-Rumble fight - Gus hasn't really shown he has one-punch knockout power so if it goes his way I'm picking it'll likely be by decision.
In other news I put my bet on too early, Rumble out to $3.30 now. Can
anyone explain to me how that's rational? Best explanations I can come up with are:
1 - everybody thinks Gus is a god because he 'almost' beat Jones
2 - everybody thinks it'll be a huge advantage that Gus is fighting in his hometown... I'm not so sure home-octagon advantage is actually a real thing in MMA?
3 - everybody thinks Rumble will gas out in a five round fight
As far as #3 goes, I remember him still looking pretty fresh at the end of three rounds with Phil Davis. This isn't the same Rumble from years ago. And Gus has only fought five rounds once himself, against Jones, and he looked pretty damn gassed by early in the fourth himself. So I don't see Rumble's cardio being a big issue...