People who have poor stats at the moment can be tracked and followed right to the table they're playing at... So if you make it on to a "Donk" list you are hounded by these "wolves" every time.you log on....
I made it on to one of those lists, every time I went to Party Poker at one point 1-3 same individuals would sit at that table within 15mins of me being there... And eachtime every one else would leave the table, leaving me to the wolves lol
If you think about it really for a minute Party Poker will never ban HUD. They will go out of business if they do.
All the top pros and serious players that keep the Poker economy alive with their money will leave. Things will down spiral with out these players moneys the prizepools will drop, drop in prizepools will attract less and less players to play and so on.
I am sure no one above considered this but the only 100% way to get rid of HUDs will be to remove hand histories. I for one will not feel safe playing on a site if I cannot replay hands I have played in. It will be easier to feel cheated in a hands as sometimes the client freezes or your network drop or you loose focus on your table for just a second and you miss what hand you loose to.
i make my account but i didnt make a deposit yet. do you know if is possible play freerolls without deposit?
Sounds like PP is really good site to play. Why don't they do what ACR/Ignition does to get to US players? Genuinely wondering because I don't know what is involved.
Without player's depositing, there is no site. The 'pros' generating all the rake do not make the site's survive. They need to regularly attract new customers, & depositing customers. They are making adjustments to facilitate this.... and because of that I think it is a good idea.
Perhaps a better idea would be to have a simplified HUD built into the software. But honestly, I'd prefer they didn't have that either.
Personally I'm comfortable being a recreational player, capable of playing 4 to 6 mtt's without a HUD.
This is a pretty dumb argument.
If you hate playing with better players than yourself & losing money, then get better ffs! or just find better games
And then when it comes to the room, the room generates money through rake & the regs generate the most rake. So what the room should do really isn't discouraging the regs to play but to encourage them & also encouraging the fun players to play & balance out things
Common Sense would lead us to believe Poker rooms will not cut off HUD's entirely but cut off out side companies providing them and the uncontrolled information they deliver...
Bringing HUD to the platform they design and control offer the end user safety and an option to continue to play as they have been for some years now... or for the umm classic poker fans like my self an option to turn off HUD would obviously be available
They will be hoping that these recreational players will boost their other products like Casino and Sportsbetting which are far more addictive to players and more profitable to the rooms than Poker.
Who else planning a 24 hour marathon? This is a sick sick promo.
Without player's depositing, there is no site. The 'pros' generating all the rake do not make the site's survive. They need to regularly attract new customers, & depositing customers.
Obviously no deposits mean no rake no site. But pros deposit as well people tend to forget about that. Also Poker rooms make money from Poker from rake not from deposits.
My view is that if HUDs are removed most of the pros will leave. This will cause the Poker to suffer significantly. You need the pros to generate the large cash games and the large gtd tournaments that attract recreational players.
The calculation for Party Poker is that they will loose on Poker but enough pros will stay to not crash the Poker economy [I think they are wrong]. They will be able to attract more recreational players with the PR of no HUDs and less Pros.
They will be hoping that these recreational players will boost their other products like Casino and Sportsbetting which are far more addictive to players and more profitable to the rooms than Poker.
Many recs don't have the problem of some players using software. They just don't care. Take pokerstars for example. Everyday you see a bunch of players who knows very little about poker jumping into higher buyin tournies trying to catch that lotto.
Why do you think poker revenues & numbers have been dropping?
A ban on HUDs is not going to solve any of these issues, and importantly the moves announced by Party is much than just a ban on HUDs. As others have written, Party are also going to force a change in player alias taking away notes. And they are not going to give out hand histories, which put trackers out of play.
And these things dont have to be related. 888 have also banned HUDs on their fast fold tables, but trackers like HM or PT are still working. This mean that players can still collect hand histories and analyse them away from the table, and to me that is a much more acceptable solution than, what Party has announced.
Also, I can not find the password for the PP TwitchViewers KO Freeroll today.
I'm just looking on the PartyPoker247 channel. Am I looking in wrong place?
it is it needs to change its name at the 17, or you can change it now because I might forget
i make my account but i didnt make a deposit yet. do you know if is possible play freerolls without deposit?
Sounds like PP is really good site to play. Why don't they do what ACR/Ignition does to get to US players? Genuinely wondering because I don't know what is involved.