Let's be honest here. There's a very blurred line between bots and human players using RTA tools. One is a bot through and through. The other is a bot with a human puppet hand that performs the actions.
Or for that matter players, who have spend 100`s of hours to work with solvers. They will also play close to perfect GTO poker, as will a well made computer program (bot). And this is also why, I personally dont care to much about this. I am using a HUD, and if someone have close to perfect GTO stats, then I will try to avoid that player. Because I know, there is no way, I can beat them, weather its just a good reg, someone using RTA or someone using a bot to play for them.
So my real criticism of ACR is, that they are making the site less and less transparent. You can no longer see, who are registered for a SnG, which makes table selection impossible. On
pokerstars by contrast this information is visible, so if for instance 6 players are registered for a 9-man, and they are all solid regulars, I can avoid registering for that particular game and find another instead. And lately ACR is not even showing a players location, which makes it more difficult to detect possible collusion or multiaccounting.
With regards to the topic, I know fundiver makes it look like this is just some guy who listed a bunch of accounts and called them bots. But it's not like that. One hundred got banned and haven't come forward to dispute it. There are 22 pages of discussion on 2+2.
I am not disputing, that there might have been bots on ACR. I am just saying, that this recent post does not add anything new to the topic, and certainly does not present any evidence, as far as I can see. Also when ACR or other sites ban accounts, they typically only announce, that they were banned for some sort of TOS violation. Which could be the use of bots, but it could also be other issues like multiaccounting or using a false identify or address.
I remember, when that 2+2 thread started, and for me some of ACRs statements almost seemed like a sort of advertisement. Like "Ok we hear, what you are saying, and now we banned 100 accounts, so look, how serious, we are taking it". But do we actually even know, if its true, that 100 accounts were banned? Not saying they were not, but in principle we only have ACRs word for it.