(cross-post from cash chat thread)
Thankfully I have withdrawn all but a few hundred bucks between PS and FT that I'd like to get out but it's not a big deal. But I've built a pretty significant BR on a Merge site that I'm now contemplating grabbing while I can (assuming I can).
IANAL, but every legal explanation I've seen of UIGEA gives it jurisdiction over financial institutions and sites, but not players themselves. The interstate
gambling cites they keep spouting are likely Wire Act citations, which has never been upheld to apply to
online poker -- it was written to cover interstate book making and sports betting long before the internet even existed. DOJ always throws it out there in their shotgun attempt at trying to make things stick in these cases, but it's widely acknowledged that it would be a significant uphill climb for them to use the Wire Act against online poker players, since the language of the law is so specific to the type of gambling it targeted then.