From Full Tilt: “
full tilt poker has no accounting of the millions of dollars of player funds that were seized by the government.”
From the US Attorney’s Office: "No individual player accounts were ever frozen or restrained, and each implicated poker company has at all times been free to reimburse any player's deposited funds.”
These two statements are what is known as spin.
First, FT has "no accounting" of US player funds simply because they don't break down the money by nationality. Give them a week and I'm certain an accountant could put a dollar value on it. The main point of this statement is to put forth the notion that the US government has seized players funds, which it indeed has.
The AG's statement that "No individual player accounts were ever frozen or restrained" is also true. However, all US players funds were not sitting in the cashier's window at FT, but rather in one of the 76 accounts which the Fed did indeed seize. Their claim that the Big Three were free to reimburse players at any time was also true, assuming that the B3 had other assets in an un-seized bank account to use.
Essentially they're playing each other for the media.
While these developments are great news for players fretting their money, it's a death knell for those of us who still want to play. Sure, I could go to a B&M in New Orleans and play all the poker I care to, but it's inconvenient for me to do so. I'm a photographer and I like to play poker while I'm editing shots and composing my magazine. (
http://www.magcloud.com/browse/Issue/157769 if anyone cares to gawk.) I seriously doubt that Harrah's will give me internet access and allow me to bring my laptop to the table…
The UIGEA Board by
M Styborski, on Flickr