Four Dogs said:This is because REAL Football requires a higher level of testosterone than can normally be found in the average European, male. That's OK though, you guys are better at other less masculine things. Like art and wine tasting and..... ah....COOKING! Yeah, you guys can cook better than us! Unless it involves fire.
smd173 said:Well the debate will always rage on as to whether online poker is really rigged.
I'll say the following:
I have had 3 Royal Flushes online in about 2+ years of play. The rough odds of a royal flush are 650K to 1. The odds of hitting the Pennsylvania Lottery's Cash 5 of 39 game is 575K to 1. I've been playing that game for over 10 years. I have no jackpot hits.
One of my Royal Flushes came when I was all in preflop with AsKs vs. QQ. My opponent flopped Quad Q's, I hit the Royal on the Turn.
I have never had a royal flush live. In fact, I've only ever even SEEN one live ONCE. I have seen 2 other royal flushes online (outside of the 3 I've gotten).
I've been at online sit n go's where you'll see Quads two times in the same game. I played for 8 hours in AC a few months back and saw Quads once during those 8 hours.
There are too many statistical anomalies online for it to be part of standard deviation. But the truth behind the online RNGs will never be revealed and there will always be a fresh crop of players waiting to play.
the fact that every royal flush i've heard about is against quads or another monster is eveidence to me that they have something tweaked for rake reasonsStyrofoam said:The thing about Online poker is they are literally running thousands if not 10s of thousands of hands in a minute all over hte site at each of the limits... is it that hard to believe that with that many hands being dealt every minute that the rarer hands come up a bit more often than "usual"?
it seems like online whenever someones got aces, another guy's got another pp and another guy has another big hand, so as to guarantee action
Dorkus Malorkus said:PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t200 (6 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx
MP (t8425)
CO (t3765)
Button (t4325)
Hero (t5859)
BB (t10460)
UTG (t4830)
Preflop: Hero is SB with Ac, Ah.
3 folds, Button calls t200, Hero raises to t825, 1 fold, Button folds.
Final Pot: t1150
Results below:
No showdown. Hero wins t1150.
---
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t100 (6 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx
Hero (t1945)
SB (t1315)
BB (t3010)
UTG (t6390)
MP (t3340)
CO (t4745)
Preflop: Hero is Button with Ad, As.
1 fold, MP calls t100, 1 fold, Hero raises to t300, 2 folds, MP folds.
Final Pot: t550
Results below:
No showdown. Hero wins t550.
---
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t20 (9 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx
Button (t1500)
SB (t1500)
BB (t1500)
Hero (t1500)
UTG+1 (t1500)
MP1 (t1500)
MP2 (t1500)
MP3 (t1500)
CO (t1500)
Preflop: Hero is UTG with As, Ac.
Hero raises to t80, 8 folds.
Final Pot: t110
Results below:
No showdown. Hero wins t110.
I could post a couple of dozen more if you like, but they're pretty dull.
Do you see a lot of successful new sites pop up lately? And since we're chiefly talking about ways to up the rake a little bit on some hands, do you realize that at the medium and higher stakes games, the rake virtually always gets maxed out even in small pots, so the incentive to pull stuff like that is out the window completely anyway. I can't remember the last time I had any kind of hand against any other kind of hand and didn't pay the maximum $3. I get away with smaller rakes when it's a blind steal situation or the turn and/or river gets checked through heads-up, but otherwise it's $3. They don't need to deal me quads vs. straight flush to make an extra buck out of me.I wonder about the people who are so quick to dismiss topics on here. It really isn't that far fetched to believe that these poker sites might be pulling little tricks in order to make more money. And the argument that there is more money to made to run honest games is a crock of shit. These sites have no regulation. What will happen to have these sites if it is found out they are pulling little tricks likes these? Nothing. People will leave, but then these same people will just start up another site.
I agree with this^^^^Do you see a lot of successful new sites pop up lately? And since we're chiefly talking about ways to up the rake a little bit on some hands, do you realize that at the medium and higher stakes games, the rake virtually always gets maxed out even in small pots, so the incentive to pull stuff like that is out the window completely anyway. I can't remember the last time I had any kind of hand against any other kind of hand and didn't pay the maximum $3. I get away with smaller rakes when it's a blind steal situation or the turn and/or river gets checked through heads-up, but otherwise it's $3. They don't need to deal me quads vs. straight flush to make an extra buck out of me.
Dismissing even the possibility is perhaps overly naïve, but given
a) how many more interesting issues there are to discuss and
b) that these threads virtually never bring anything new to the table
... yes, we're pretty fast to dismiss them. It's not that it couldn't happen, it's that these posts never bring out any kind of evidence at all. No, anecdotal evidence doesn't cut it.
Pah, rugby= real mans sport, and no body armour required. And as for a tought sport ???
hurling HURLING [hurling] outdoor ball and stick game similar to field hockey . The national pastime of Ireland,
Figures the Irish would have a sport named for a by product of the other thing they are famous for!
It has been done, combu. Several times I think. People are just ignorant
Don't have a link, but I'm sure if you google it you could find one.
3) Always chase flushes and straights. you will be suprised how many you will hit on the river.
4) If you flop a straight or a flush, fold immediatly. If you flop a straight someone will get a flush and if you flop a flush someone will get a fullhouse.