Why not look up some of the hands that he played well?Here's another. Why does he criticize someone for calling a raise after the flop when the guy has 2 pair!?!? Of course he'd call that raise with 10 J.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mOl8nR4Ryc
You got to respect his ability to play . . . and completely loathe his attitude. Regardless of however delusional he is, it makes fantastic entertainment.
This video warms my heart like a cute little puppy does - Tony G - Welcome to the game - YouTube
Tony just punishes him so much! Did you enjoy it?
When you are the LOSER, you don't tell everyone how YOU'D have played the hand.
What a jackass. You lost fair and square. There is no "should". Same rules for everyone.
What a sore loser. *Phil actually is the idiot. *
7% odds means you can actually win 7% of the time.
Phil seems to think 7% is 0% and only thinks in absolutes.
It's called bluffing. Get over it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tdW3VsDUNgE
Whatever, Dwan went all in with pocket 10s, and hit trips. A little luck is part of the game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Un8xBYFIe8
If he won by going all in with K J, then tough sht.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoZeCEl6PNc
You know what I am getting at.
Yes, I agree it’s horrific low-odds playing, but horrific playing pays off once in a blue moon. Phil needs to accept that. Alternatively, if Phil folded, it would have been a brilliant re-raise bluff, etc. Luck is part of the game.
Phil can’t adjust his game to play crappy amateur players. So he loses. He needs to know they will go in with wacky sht. A great player adjusts to the context.
Actually this ^ statement is not correct (why am I not surprised?).At any rate, thanks to Daniel Negreanu, he has competition in the "big head" department. "OMG, I have to be in my seat when the dealer starts dealing out the cards? Why wasn't I consulted about this first? The nerve of some people!"
Actually this ^ statement is not correct (why am I not surprised?).
As the ruling is worded, it was in fact a bad call against Negreanu.
Clearly you seem to know how they all are thinking. With reads like this are you sure you aren't actually Phil Helmuth himself?
When you are the LOSER, you don't tell everyone how YOU'D have played the hand.
What a jackass. You lost fair and square. There is no "should". Same rules for everyone.
What a sore loser. *Phil actually is the idiot. *
7% odds means you can actually win 7% of the time.
Phil seems to think 7% is 0% and only thinks in absolutes.
It's called bluffing. Get over it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tdW3VsDUNgE
Whatever, Dwan went all in with pocket 10s, and hit trips. A little luck is part of the game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Un8xBYFIe8
If he won by going all in with K J, then tough sht.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoZeCEl6PNc
Kind of hard for them to feel belittled, considering the circumstances. I mean...his belittling of someone is not going to be very effective if they just schooled him in poker..I love watching Phill play, he is one of the most entertaining people to watch imo. I do feel bad for some of the players when he calls them morons and idiots though, I wish he would stop belittling people, while still being the Phill that throws fits.
I don't know, but I'm relatively new in the game. I've got 2 or 3 years in now and my game has shown much improvement over the last 6 months.What is so funny is that while he certainly cannot stand being bluffed, that is why he went out in this years WSOP main event; he bluffed off all his chips with no hand whatsoever. And, of course, assumed the other guy was bluffing him.
"Bluff-a-Phobia", maybe?