
vinnie
Legend
Bronze Level
Yellow is all-in adjusted. It says how much money the odds say someone should win playing those same all-in situations over a long period of time.What is the yellow meaning?
Yellow is all-in adjusted. It says how much money the odds say someone should win playing those same all-in situations over a long period of time.What is the yellow meaning?
Yeah so your red line is a bit high and showdown too low, this indicates you are being a touch too aggro probably 3betting a fair amount and at least double barrelling most hands. You can get away with this in zoom as the player pool won't know what you are doing for quite a while.
The problem with doing this is that you will fold out most of your opponents mediocre holdings by the end of the turn. Once you get to the river all they have left is the top of their ranges. This is why bluffing on the end doesn't work very often as to get to the river against heavy betting they have to be strong.
Now once the Borg start to catch on you are just an aggro they will adapt, you will find they will 4bet you more, check raise your cbet more and call you down lighter. These are natural adjustments to make against looser players with high cbet rates.
A couple of years ago VinylSpiros and I did an experiment in 5nl zoom where for an hour we 3bet every playable hand and then full potted both flop and turn. The win rate was silly and our chart had a massive redline and a low blue line and looked similar to yours. It makes you realise how easy it is to fold people out with aggression but that it won't work forever.
So you need to start checking some more flops and turns with your 2nd pair type hands. Hands with some showdown value but with little chance of improving. But you know in zoom if you take your foot off their throat they are going to bet into you if you check so you need to call at least once sometimes with 2nd best hands. Its all about finding the balance and targetting your barrelling at looser players and less against the tighter ones. You can barrel nits as they often won't gii without the nuts so I suggest you have a look at their WTSD% early in the hand and don't barrel the tighter players who's WTSD% is over 30
When your red line and blue line diverge like that, you're definitely bluffing too much in the wrong spots, and calling down in the wrong spots. It's all fixable, so keep posting hands around this kind of issue, and I'll do my best to provide some tips for how to approach these spots.
I like to keep poker simple, and there is a basic formula in some of these situations you can apply. Nothing is exact of course though.
Actually your AI adjusted shows that your true win rate is 21 dollars, compared to your actual 43. Now given you can’t change Money Won Without Showdown, this difference (22$) is from blue line. Making your true blue line around 7 dollars.It looks very ordinary I think.
However if we also look your hand histories and combine it to this graph, I would say agro-fishes you counter on the 5NL have altered your poker reality.
Could you explain what you mean here? I don't get it. In what way did it alter it. And what do you mean with poker reality?
Strategy he uses: wait for strong hand and run like a bull seeing red.Luls they are just fancy words, they don’t actually mean anything. You should know me already.
I just meant that compared to passive player pool at 2NL where any imaginable call play is possible at 5NL you find lots of more aggression. Now this aggression is usually aggression that hardly ever makes sense for logical mind, it’s easy to just generalize and say with top pair that hero has the winning hand and push it to the end. Even though concepts like pot control, trapping aggressive player, not betting too thinly on the river ie passive nuances of poker are starting to be also important. Protective bets are part of the poker, but not in any way close of being on the same importance with value bets. For example our hero has a habit of betting for protection to not give free cards, even though this is correct, no way is this something we should always do.
UUh, so I was trying to say that our hero might be fighting solely with aggression with too little passive tools. And reason for this might be over adjusting because how only part of the pool play.
At the end this is meaningless given how good win rate he has, obviously he has just found a good way to make money. But smooth (I would call this balanced, but it’s probably wrong) strategy where every tool in the poker book (also passive tools) are in use that is not.
Strategy he uses: wait for strong hand and run like a bull seeing red.
Problem is the one holding the flag is a donkey not a matador.
After he checks the turn he is showing respect to your tightness; never assume he will lose respect on the river.
When the fish respects the shark, if there are no blood in the water then it's time to make them fear on top of respect.
Always always shove that river.
With win rates like that I would call him a butcher, bull on the meat counter might leave matador unemployed.
Actually your AI adjusted shows that your true win rate is 21 dollars, compared to your actual 43. Now given you can’t change Money Won Without Showdown, this difference (22$) is from blue line. Making your true blue line around 7 dollars.
Compared to your earlier 2NL graphs these 5NL graphs do look a bit ‘sick’. I would think it’s result of meeting aggression with even more aggression instead of balanced approach (bet range, check range, fold range, call range). Genearlly speaking imo blue line should be the major component in low limits, but obviously it’s not the only way to play. However if we also look your hand histories and combine it to this graph, I would say agro-fishes you counter on the 5NL have altered your poker reality.
This is obviously over analyzing things from merely 2.5k hands, but maybe it contains some truth.
Another couple of interesting spots
partypoker - $0.05 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4: http://www.pokertracker.com
BTN: 120.2 BB (VPIP: 31.25, PFR: 18.75, 3Bet Preflop: 14.29, Hands: 16)
SB: 84 BB (VPIP: 24.32, PFR: 21.62, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 37)
Hero (BB): 312.2 BB
UTG: 136.6 BB (VPIP: 35.00, PFR: 25.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 23)
MP: 114.2 BB (VPIP: 22.73, PFR: 16.67, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 67)
CO: 114.8 BB (VPIP: 20.83, PFR: 16.67, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 24)
SB posts SB 0.4 BB, Hero posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.4 BB) Hero has 4s 4d
fold, fold, fold, BTN raises to 2.2 BB, fold, Hero raises to 7 BB, BTN calls 4.8 BB
----------------
I didn't want to 4bet here cause of being deep stacked. Wanted to see how things would develop on flop. Was the call on the flop unnecessary?
partypoker - $0.05 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4: http://www.pokertracker.com
BTN: 100 BB (VPIP: 50.00, PFR: 50.00, 3Bet Preflop: -, Hands: 2)
SB: 692.2 BB (VPIP: 25.40, PFR: 21.60, 3Bet Preflop: 15.56, Hands: 131)
BB: 100 BB (VPIP: 13.33, PFR: 6.67, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 15)
Hero (UTG): 350.2 BB
MP: 263 BB (VPIP: 19.05, PFR: 14.29, 3Bet Preflop: 8.33, Hands: 21)
CO: 100 BB (VPIP: 17.95, PFR: 15.38, 3Bet Preflop: 10.34, Hands: 82)
SB posts SB 0.4 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.4 BB) Hero has Kc Kd
Hero raises to 3 BB, MP raises to 10.4 BB, fold, fold, fold, fold, Hero calls 7.4 BB
Flop : (22.2 BB, 2 players) 3c Ad Qs
Hero checks, MP bets 9 BB, Hero calls 9 BB
Turn : (40.2 BB, 2 players) 4h
Hero checks, MP bets 18 BB, fold
MP wins 56.2 BB
---------------------------------------
partypoker - $0.05 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4: http://www.pokertracker.com
BTN: 104.6 BB (VPIP: 100.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: -, Hands: 1)
SB: 200.8 BB (VPIP: 40.00, PFR: 27.14, 3Bet Preflop: 11.54, Hands: 71)
BB: 92.8 BB (VPIP: 0.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: -, Hands: 4)
UTG: 101 BB (VPIP: 16.67, PFR: 16.67, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 6)
Hero (MP): 330.8 BB
CO: 112.4 BB (VPIP: 17.72, PFR: 15.19, 3Bet Preflop: 10.34, Hands: 83)
SB posts SB 0.4 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.4 BB) Hero has Js Jd
fold, Hero raises to 3 BB, fold, BTN calls 3 BB, fold, fold
Flop : (7.4 BB, 2 players) Tc Qd Ac
Hero bets 5.2 BB, BTN raises to 22.8 BB, fold
BTN wins 34.6 BB
By the way what is the standard cbet percentage when I'm the pre flop aggressor with one villain in the pot?
Mine is around 80 I think.
Gives us a chance! been at work all day!Must have been a bad article. lol![]()
just read it. good article. thanks.
When you say the board is really good for the hero, you meant that it suits the BBs range better right?
Gives us a chance! been at work all day!
I take it you saving the turn small overbet tactic for hands with a little less equity than this?
I can see we wouldn't want to get shoved on if we led fairly large into the turn with this exact hand. But where is the cut off between the two tactics?
Hi. Is it too late for me to join the discussion?
I've been reading the book (and this thread), and I have found it to be quite helpful. I have encountered a few strategies that other books do not advocate (or even advise against), but that seem to work to some extent for me.
Anyway, if I am not allowed to post here (due to being several years late, lol), I will understand.