At the start of CHapter 7: 3-Betting you are saying that "removing a lot of your opponent's small pairs and marginal hands increases your equity with a high un-paired hand like AQo, but decreases with a big pair (JJ)".
The thing is that in your equity simulator AQo has :
57.64% vs calling a CO open of 29.5 and
48.97 % vs CO 3-Bet calling range,
So the equity is decreasing actually. I'm a little bit confuse here.
Good morning. I can't believe my luck! I really didn't think I had any! That's why I wanted to learn how to play poker because it's less about luck and more about skill. But coming across this site, then by chance this thread, has blown my mind.
One of my goals for this year is to learn poker strategy. I am a very new player and would like to know if I can join this thread?
John, Thanks for offering your knowledge for the price of good karma. I have read the last 3 chapters and have already learned more than I could imagine.
I just downloaded the trial version of Poker Coach. Is this kind of software good ?
Does it consider the type of players I am playing with?
I tested the challenge it has and I had the impression that the software was some kind of LAG Calling Station.
Some of the advices were good but some of them looked like Sience Fiction to me.
Well I went to pokersoftware to see about Leak Buster 4.0 . While there I bumped into those lots of software tools. I went to the training section and I downloaded this one to see what it is about. I thought it would be nice to run some simulations of the examples in your book.Why are you posting about this in here? Can you beat it? Your question / statement doesn't even make sense. There's tons of different personality and player types you're against. Some are bad LAGs, some are good LAGs, some are tag, some are fish. It's still beta. If you have questions about it, you can post elsewhere or PM me in private.
Well I went to pokersoftware to see about Leak Buster 4.0 . While there I bumped into those lots of software tools. I went to the training section and I downloaded this one to see what it is about. I thought it would be nice to run some simulations of the examples in your book.
I also saw the Challenge option and thought to give it a try HU 0.5/1 against the computer. After one hour I had a 4BI stack.
I had to ask a real coach if a coaching software will be of any help. It is cheaper until I will afford a real coach.
I know it has nothing to do with the thread but here is where you can be find most of the time and you are a real coach.
Lol. I just find out that it is a Ace Poker Coach. It actually looks a lot better than what I found and it costs less. Poker Coach 2 is what I found.
No. Because I did not know that APC exists. I had downloaded the Ace Poker Drills but was not curious that time to look for the other software your page provided.I'm not understanding what you're saying though. You are saying you were using Poker Coach 2 and not Ace Poker coach? I assume that's the case because APC does not have HU's right now.
A nice example of how three betting from the button can pay off
Probably could have just called this deep stacked what do you think?
Full Tilt, 30/60 blinds No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 9 Players
UTG+2: 3,050 (50.8 bb)
MP1: 3,603 (60.1 bb)
MP2: 11,346 (189.1 bb)
MP3: 1,742 (29 bb)
CO: 2,250 (37.5 bb)
Hero (BTN): 10,317 (172 bb)
SB: 979 (16.3 bb)
BB: 2,542 (42.4 bb)
UTG+1: 3,597 (60 bb)
Preflop: Hero is BTN with 6h 7h
3 folds, MP2 raises to 150, 2 folds, Hero raises to 420, 2 folds, MP2 calls 270
Flop: (930) 4s 6c 6s (2 players)
MP2 checks, Hero bets 540, MP2 calls 540
Turn: (2,010) 4c (2 players)
MP2 checks, Hero bets 1,020, MP2 calls 1,020
River: (4,050) 9c (2 players)
MP2 checks, Hero bets 2,700, MP2 raises to 6,480, Hero raises to 8,337 and is all-in, MP2 calls 1,857
Results: 20,724 pot
Final Board: 4s 6c 6s 4c 9c
MP2 mucked Ac Tc and lost (-10,317 net)
Hero showed 6h 7h and won 20,724 (10,407 net)
Ok rather than playing this evening I've spent a couple of hours reviewing hands that went to showdown using HM2.
I went back and reviewed hands from May this year. it was mainly 2-5c
This was a useful exercise I suggest others try it as well
My findings
1. I was and still am putting players on flush draws way too often. They are usually calling with 2nd/3rd pair and or backdoor combos.
2, Two checks really does mean they don't have anything and some more bluffs in these circumstances will have netted me a much extra value.
3, Players with aggression factors over 3 will often take a shot at the pot on the flop or turn with air and then slow down if called.
4. Big bets and re-raises on the turn or river usually mean the nuts especially at the lower stakes
5. Most are calling with any old garbage in the big blind.
6. Fish call to the river with any pair or back door flush run combos then check when they miss or bet big when they hit.... I was missing way to much thin value on the river by checking back.
7. I had regular good chuckle at the total garbage I was seeing a lot of opponents with at showdown.
8. As an exercise I'm generally pretty good at judging players ranges from their combined vpip and pfr stats, I actually think I'm quite strong in this area (I am an analyst in the real world) and I have been working on the ace poker drills equity trainer.
9, I was opening too early and calling with too many trouble hands, some thing I have now rectified. I am now happy with my preflop play.
10. Did I really call some of those hands which were obviously the nuts oh dear..
A nice example of how three betting from the button can pay off
Probably could have just called this deep stacked what do you think?
Full Tilt, 30/60 blinds No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 9 Players
UTG+2: 3,050 (50.8 bb)
MP1: 3,603 (60.1 bb)
MP2: 11,346 (189.1 bb)
MP3: 1,742 (29 bb)
CO: 2,250 (37.5 bb)
Hero (BTN): 10,317 (172 bb)
SB: 979 (16.3 bb)
BB: 2,542 (42.4 bb)
UTG+1: 3,597 (60 bb)
Preflop: Hero is BTN with 6h 7h
3 folds, MP2 raises to 150, 2 folds, Hero raises to 420, 2 folds, MP2 calls 270
Flop: (930) 4s 6c 6s (2 players)
MP2 checks, Hero bets 540, MP2 calls 540
Turn: (2,010) 4c (2 players)
MP2 checks, Hero bets 1,020, MP2 calls 1,020
River: (4,050) 9c (2 players)
MP2 checks, Hero bets 2,700, MP2 raises to 6,480, Hero raises to 8,337 and is all-in, MP2 calls 1,857
Results: 20,724 pot
Final Board: 4s 6c 6s 4c 9c
MP2 mucked Ac Tc and lost (-10,317 net)
Hero showed 6h 7h and won 20,724 (10,407 net)
Hmm, not sure about 3-betting this one. There is a super short stack in the SB, who is probably getting it in wide. Do you have any reads that MP2 folds a lot to 3-bets? If not I am probably calling if the SB is not really active, or folding if he is. Other than that, wp. I would have only bet the turn a bit bigger, something like 1400-1600, putting him on a medium pair or a spade draw mostly.
You should legitimately semibluff bet here on the flop with your flush draw. on that flop texture you will take it down more often than not.
Once called you should assume he has a Q and is going to call again unless aK or A hits. So you should check the turn hope for a free card. He will nearly away bet the turn here. Call if you get decent odds or just fold, you aren't drawing to the nut flush you don't have any overcards and if the flush card arrives the flush is out there and he shouldnt pay off much. I think your check raise bluff is too ambitious here. It is one way to take this down but you need to bet very large to pull it off.
This was from the Raptor on Full tilt last night and helped me win the CC hoodie for best finish in the Full Tilt card chat invasion.
Having reviewed the stack sizes again 3-betting here wasn't necessary at all as the stack sizes are over 170bb. Also I hadn't seen the shortie in the SB well spotted Fisi.
3-betting does give you the initiative though and helped to get more money into the pot early thus making it easier for all the stacks to go in.
The turn gives us a full house, if we bet too much here we can chase him off if he has AK or similar. I actually put him on an over pair something like 77-jj..in which case he only has 2 outs.
Better imo to keep him in and hope he calls a river bet, which looks likely at those stacks, he will want to see what I have and to keep me honest.
As it happens he connects an Ace high flush. Stacks in...happy days and around 350bigs
With ~16bbs, you can't really worry too much about the SB. That's generally not a deciding factor when hero has a stack this size. After a raise and 3-bet, SB's jam range is going to be pretty narrow. Worst case is SB does jam, hero probably still have 30% equity versus his range, but hero loses and knocks off 16bbs from his 172 bbs stack.
I'm typically not a fan of 3-betting small SC's, but in a tourney deep with position, this is perfectly fine. NH.
So I'm posting this because this is most definitely one of my biggest leaks. I was doing pretty well at the table and felt fairly confident that I could open up a bit. I was really working on taking my time in each hand because I tend to rush through and want to close out my opponent earlier than what I could, hence not making as much as I possible. I felt fairly good and then this happens. I was light on the value bet I know but I'm posting this to see how far ahead I should have known. I ended the session shortly after and finished even so nothing lost but I'm hoping for some insight gained.
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.02 BB (9 handed) - PokerStars Converter Tool from http://www.flopturnriver.com
SB ($2.17)
BB ($2.50)
UTG ($2.18)
Hero (UTG+1) ($2.05)
MP1 ($1.97)
MP2 ($1.93)
MP3 ($1.50)
CO ($2.26)
Button ($1.47)
Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with 10d, Jd
1 fold, Hero raises to $0.06, 1 fold, MP2 calls $0.06, 5 folds
Flop: ($0.15) 3c, 7d, Qd (2 players)
Hero checks, MP2 bets $0.14, Hero calls $0.14
Turn: ($0.43) 2c (2 players)
Hero checks, MP2 bets $0.14, Hero raises to $0.28, MP2 calls $0.14
River: ($0.99) 10c (2 players)
Hero bets $0.44, MP2 calls $0.44
Total pot: $1.87 | Rake: $0.07
Sorry lost part of the hand. Villain had KK and took the pot