Congratz, it seems, hard work was done, for next limit, i think, you can do the same, but reduce amount of tables before you feel comfortable.
Just being nice! But yeah my BS senses were tingling... then I realised after i posted it was the same guy from the other thread
Why you always have to appear in a thread and bring everyone back to earth? 😄
100% agree
You can only 4-table max. on Stars per buyin level in ZOOM. And you can only 3-table on 888 SNAP tables. Aside from the rest of the post reeking of nonsense, you haven't even researched the number of tables one can play to make it even remotely believable.
Is this limitation true for zoom tables as well? I know it was implemented on regular tables, as a reason to avoid bumhunting and other things theocratically, but what would be the point of limiting zoom tables? If one can play 8 tables of this fast-paced madness - why prohibit it?
Because honestly, 4 or 5 tables is pretty much the max. that any normal human could play without occasionally timing out &/or slowing the game down for the rest of the player pool.
That makes sense, thanks 🙂👍
Yes exactly this. Just imagine if a total of 40 people are playing, and the same player has 6 or 8 entries. Then they would need to wait for tables to form, which they were not already on, and other players would see them in every single hand, which is not the idea of the format. So of course there has to be a limitation.
It makes it easy to discern who the regs. are.
In theory the reason would be the same as the cap on regular cash tables. To make it more difficult to play poker for profit and hopefully make the games softer. The german government has enforced a 4 table cap for all sort of games and across sites, and presumably this is because, they prefer people to spend time on other things than playing poker professionally.
And I think, my friend, that you are just a liar.
It is for sure difficult to see, why he need advice on how to beat 5NL and 10NL, if he has been able to win an amazing $1.500 or 750 BIs at 2NL in just one month. In fact he is the one, who should be giving advice to all us mortals, who can only dream about such resultsAnd I think, my friend, that you are just a liar.
How many hands of ZOOM style poker have you played? On which sites? What... a few thousand hands on 1 site?
Dont know the exact number, but maybe around 100k or so. Most on PokerStars but also a decent number on 888 Poker and a few on ACR.
Most hands were in my old (now crashed) PT4 database from PokerStars. And running filters in that database there were some fairly large differences, like the situation "raising over a limp" happening far more often at regular tables than at similar style Zoom tables. Zoom tables at least on Stars also have notoriously low players per flop numbers. So yes they are generally a nit-fest, and regular tables are softer. At least if you do a bit of table selection, which of course you should. There is no reason to sit on a 6-max table and battle it out with 5 other regs.
