When entering a regular cash table, we should consider which tables to choose. Since you can't play many simultaneous tables as if it were ante, but what factors will we take into account. Everything indicates that this is not important, but depending on whether you are recreational or professional, everything indicates if you want to have a good time, it doesn't matter these data, but if your goal is to win money, I think that the time to choose tables is mainly based on the number of hands played per hour. What do you think there are other factors I would like a comment
hop on the table play tight if unknowns just enough
hands to keep afloat and watch opponents look for patterns and what people are showing down vs certain sizes and stationing too or just how often opening estimating it 3betting etc floating to river blah blah.
then if see an obvious bleeder or someone where fat edge can be made had on them in areas sit and stay, if dont or the gaps or things you see that can attack are marginal mostly bar the area your found out they bleed heavy, then get off as sitting waiting to see that or where that is is stupid, focus on playing with maniacs and aggtards (aggtard i am myself) and massive passive stations that care nothing about bet size and snap you with really weak hands too too often rivers.
but yh sit and find out if looks dead or meh get off target major bleeders cause we all have to pay alot of rake to the house lot comes off the table from each players stack per hr or whatever, even if have edge on regs its still not worth it unless your playing high, as it just ups volatility increases
bankroll needed too pushing even smaller edges more breakeven bluffs heros etc, just look for bleeder and focus all the attention on them preferably 2 or more bleeders.
cause other thing is tilt and depending how bad you tilt even if have edge or regs playing your game if you tilt too frequently or monkey tilt its bye bye edge and you become fish or breakeven vs them.
simple answer focus on fish cause we all pay loads of ****ing rake particularly 2-50nl.
also play as many tables as can where can still think enough on each street or imagine are hudless if arent already (if i was hudless i could play 2-3 tables probably really just 2, with hud its 3-5 or 6 at push if sites slow, but depends how tight or what style of play im implementing in first place if im playing loose as possibly get away with then yh 2-3 tables tops if im playing tag or nitty least pre... then ok 4-5 is about fine).
also dont play zoom or any other fast fold format least with holdem it dont make for good game casino and sites love it though as its raketrap machine, but holdem no limit holdem specifically it zoom just really isnt good, not saying people dont win they do, but winrates will be lower i think and theres no table dynamics back and forth in the same way to play off, or patterns you spot are more wishwashy, cause gameflow aint the same.
bumhunting underrated its just kinda boring having to be strict doing so, but rake is large chunk players biggest enemy so the house is still what tryna beat ha its pushed promoted as skill game and betting against others but i really dont think people get its marginally a skill game its mainly just milk fish maniacs and gamblers have edge big enough after to rake to make playing cards for the house worth your time.
really poker players should team up more make more private games take the house out the picture hopefully but whatever, yh quality of the table matters dont want a table of regs or breakeven players as everyone just loses to rake as unlikely anyone has edge big enough to make any money after rake.
also important is ease of getting on and off tables and liquidity and speed of the deal (i use to love sky poker for that reason as had barely any timebank but the no hud and the speed of play and the forced only few bet size buttons meant i dont know and the small pool meant the games were good even if rake was more).
ipoker as example games are probably better but speed of deal and gameflow take longer to achieve so and dynamics how the site players play overall is different but getting on tables is a pain yh slow deal hands per hr so even if winrate higher rake higher too, it might similar hourly to elsewhere still, like im currently playing on pokerstars mainly as softwares good ish.... err and speed of deal got sped up i think when sky bought it or whatever or someone bought pokerstars, but yh speed of deal better think they cut timebank down bit which is a pro in my mind also table cap so table quality should be higher too and less mass table people slowing down games, and yh gameflow dynmanics eaiser to create and patterns in opponent become more obvious quicker and larger player pool global one means good liquidity so the games that run pretty much all the time theres gonna be some fish in the pools you can hunt around for.