There are quite a few situations in which it is possible, or even necessary, to play outside the box, breaking certain conventional rules or strategies. The situation you described is one of them.What do you guys think? There is an old saying "never limp" but there are rare spots where it can be profitable imo.
Example: we get AA on the button heads up and our opponent is short.
Do u know of other, similar situations?There are quite a few situations in which it is possible, or even necessary, to play outside the box, breaking certain conventional rules or strategies. The situation you described is one of them.
I also sometimes gained or saw value by limping medium weak hands against passive-weak players in position.In games with antes, like most tournaments, SB limping definitely has a lot of merit. Its also pretty common to limp the button heads up with short stacks. Finally good players will sometimes limp BTN in situations with high ICM pressure to take away, what would otherwise be a good rejamming spot. And then of course their is the super exploitable "limp AA UTG with a short stack" strategy, if you think, you will get raised a ton. Not something I personally do, but on the right table it can be an ok play.
No that limp with 18bb in middle pos with aq makes no sense. Its an open/reshove or even openshove to me.For the most part in Mtt play you really should not be doing very much open limping.
There are some low blind situations where you can use the limp and go, the limp and pray, or the limp and outplay.
There also low blind situations with AA where you may want to limp to maximize the pot.
If you have 18BBs and are in mid with AQ against all GTO players you can limp, but I dont know about you, but I am more likely to run into sitter limpers than I am winning GTO players.
Of course, it all depends on the situation. Sometimes you need to surprise your opponents, otherwise the game will be boring, but you should never get carried away and always know the limitWhat do you guys think? There is an old saying "never limp" but there are rare spots where it can be profitable imo.
Example: we get AA on the button heads up and our opponent is short.
The more passive the players the more we want to raise not limp-when passive players 3 bet we get to fold vs their tight ranges knowing we are not being bluffed--- we use limps to protect hands that have good equity to play but not for a standard 3 bet size which would reduce our SPR--- hands such as KT QT JT all off suit ....etc. We do not want to limp J3s because we want to use it to steal pots post flop more often than we would with say KT that can show down and win a lot or beat worse KX J3 cannot do either of those things very well. If we bluff flop after we raise J3s with a backdoor flush draw and turn brings in another flush card we can continue to pressure our V with our strong equity draw.I also sometimes gained or saw value by limping medium weak hands against passive-weak players in position.
Example: everyone folds to me on the button and i got something like j3s with very passive players in the blinds. Sometimes, depending on my stack, i choose to limp in these kind of spots.