L
LuisBoaC
Rock Star
Silver Level
Villian Stats (VPIP/PFR/AF): 55/10/6
Initially I thought this was a cooler but now I wonder if the clues were there. The all-in player (SB) has been tight and passive all game. Villain has seen a lot of flops but rarely open raised or 3-bet pre. The c-bet in position was in character but I wonder if the size should have made me wary, especially as it was into a side pot? Should the fact that villain was ignoring the opportunity for implicit collusion to eliminate a player have convinced me I was beaten?
As I've written this I now think folding would have been too tight, don't think I can narrow his range far enough, can I? On Equilab giving villain a super-tight range of QQ+, AK+ (and the player who is all-in on any 2) still gives me 25% equity. But should I have just called? If so, what to do on turn and river? Do I need to give more thought to what SB has?
pokerstars, $3.11 + $0.39 - Hold'em No Limit - 60/120 (15 ante) - 6 players
Replay this hand on Upswing Poker
UTG: 2,929 (24 bb)
MP (Hero): 2,465 (21 bb)
CO: 1,282 (11 bb)
BU: 3,980 (33 bb)
SB: 496 (4 bb)
BB: 2,348 (20 bb)
Pre-Flop: (270) Hero is MP with K♥ Q♦
1 fold, Hero raises to 360, 1 fold, BTN 3-bets to 600, SB calls 421 (all-in), 1 fold, Hero calls 240
Flop: (1,891) 9♦ K♠ 6♥ (3 players, 1 all-in)
Hero checks, BTN bets 1,080, Hero raises to 1,850 (all-in), BTN calls 770
Turn: (5,591) 6♣ (3 players, 2 all-in)
River: (5,591) 2♠ (3 players, 2 all-in)
Total pot: 5,591
Showdown:
MP (Hero) shows K♥ Q♦ (two pair, Kings and Sixes)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 13%, Flop: 22%, Turn: 5%, River: 0%)
BU shows A♣ A♦ (two pair, Aces and Sixes)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 81%, Flop: 70%, Turn: 2%, River: 0%)
SB shows 6♦ A♥ (three of a kind, Sixes)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 6%, Flop: 9%, Turn: 93%, River: 100%)
BU wins 3,938
SB wins 1,653
Initially I thought this was a cooler but now I wonder if the clues were there. The all-in player (SB) has been tight and passive all game. Villain has seen a lot of flops but rarely open raised or 3-bet pre. The c-bet in position was in character but I wonder if the size should have made me wary, especially as it was into a side pot? Should the fact that villain was ignoring the opportunity for implicit collusion to eliminate a player have convinced me I was beaten?
As I've written this I now think folding would have been too tight, don't think I can narrow his range far enough, can I? On Equilab giving villain a super-tight range of QQ+, AK+ (and the player who is all-in on any 2) still gives me 25% equity. But should I have just called? If so, what to do on turn and river? Do I need to give more thought to what SB has?
pokerstars, $3.11 + $0.39 - Hold'em No Limit - 60/120 (15 ante) - 6 players
Replay this hand on Upswing Poker
UTG: 2,929 (24 bb)
MP (Hero): 2,465 (21 bb)
CO: 1,282 (11 bb)
BU: 3,980 (33 bb)
SB: 496 (4 bb)
BB: 2,348 (20 bb)
Pre-Flop: (270) Hero is MP with K♥ Q♦
1 fold, Hero raises to 360, 1 fold, BTN 3-bets to 600, SB calls 421 (all-in), 1 fold, Hero calls 240
Flop: (1,891) 9♦ K♠ 6♥ (3 players, 1 all-in)
Hero checks, BTN bets 1,080, Hero raises to 1,850 (all-in), BTN calls 770
Turn: (5,591) 6♣ (3 players, 2 all-in)
River: (5,591) 2♠ (3 players, 2 all-in)
Total pot: 5,591
Showdown:
MP (Hero) shows K♥ Q♦ (two pair, Kings and Sixes)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 13%, Flop: 22%, Turn: 5%, River: 0%)
BU shows A♣ A♦ (two pair, Aces and Sixes)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 81%, Flop: 70%, Turn: 2%, River: 0%)
SB shows 6♦ A♥ (three of a kind, Sixes)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 6%, Flop: 9%, Turn: 93%, River: 100%)
BU wins 3,938
SB wins 1,653