A
Amblo
Legend
Bronze Level
hands will be selected by the following criteria:
1) Hands with no losses or gains
2) Hands won without show dawn
3) Lost hands without showdawn:
4) Hands won at the show dawn
5) Lost Hands at the show dawn
6) Hands that were ahead and equity held
7) Hands that was behind and equity held
8) Hands that was in front and lost
9) Hands that was behind and won
10)Total flips played
11) flip coin situations I missed
12)Flip Coin Situations I've Won
*Considering from 56% to 99% as hands I was in front, thus doing after large sampling the average margin of the % I was ahead. Applying the same formula for inverse situations. That is: hands that I was behind with the inverse parameter that I would have 44% or less of chances.
*Flip situations will be considered between 45% to 55% for both parties, also making a final average just to ensure that this item is in the 50/50 margin in a large sample. (Note some hands that are genuine flips show an oscillation in the hud between 56% and 55% of equity or between 44% and 45% but they will be calculated correctly with detail and screenshots proving except cases of flip coin that block like TT vs AKo for example, but in this case the equity exceeds the threshold of even 56%)
*I will take screenshots of all situations in the hud except for items 1;2;3;4;5 because there is not much need. However, the database will always be available for the purpose of authenticity of the study, free from trends or deviations.
* Total hands won in show dawn item 4 include tie hands that appear as wins on the HUD and also split equity hands such as 33/33/33/3-handed or 25/25/25/25/4-handed for example. therefore, there may be a discrepancy in the sum of items 6;7;8;9;10 , not matching the total number of hands involving show dawn , so we will use the total sum or crossing of such items among themselves to determine the comparative parameter.
*The most relevant items for research on equity are items: 6;7;8;9;10;11;12;13. Therefore, items: 1;2;3;4;5 will be for personal use or only for purposes of evidence or later use if necessary comparisons.
*New parameters and criteria may be added according to the need of the study, in order to determine and collect data with greater precision and detail, thus being able to add new criteria during the course of the study.
*Flip coins are easier and can be compared with each other in a large sample, having to be as close to 50/50 or the final calculated average.
*The sum of hands without losses and gains + hands won without show dawn + hands lost without show dawn + hands won at show dawn + hands lost at show dawn is = the total number of hands. (for mathematical authenticity purposes) real proof
*The sum of items 4 and 5 minus items 6;7;8;9;10 is equal to item 13.
*The sum of items 4 and 5 minus Item 13 minus item 10 is equal to the comparison ceiling for items 6;7;8;9 or , the sum of items 6;7;8;9 is equal to the ceiling of comparison of the isolated mesos.
*The sum of items *4 and *5 is the total margin of hands for the show dawn, ie 100%. Where inside are all the situations of items 6;7;8;9;10 serving as a ceiling for proportional comparison of the same.
*The sum of items 6;7 is equal to the total number of hands that equity held. as it should.
*The sum of items 8;9 is equal to the total number of hands that equity was reversed.
*The sum of items 6 and 9 is equal to 100% of the showdans I won (except the flip coins which have to be calculated separately).
*The sum of items 7 and 8 is equal to the show dawns I lost (except the flip coins which have to be calculated separately).
*It is possible to add the number of chips involved in items 8;9, thus being able to describe the amount of chips lost and won in each situation (how much we lose when we are ahead and equity is reversed and how much we gain when we are behind and equity is reversed.
*The street to street equity will also be determined later separately using the same parameters.
1) Hands with no losses or gains
2) Hands won without show dawn
3) Lost hands without showdawn:
4) Hands won at the show dawn
5) Lost Hands at the show dawn
6) Hands that were ahead and equity held
7) Hands that was behind and equity held
8) Hands that was in front and lost
9) Hands that was behind and won
10)Total flips played
11) flip coin situations I missed
12)Flip Coin Situations I've Won
*Considering from 56% to 99% as hands I was in front, thus doing after large sampling the average margin of the % I was ahead. Applying the same formula for inverse situations. That is: hands that I was behind with the inverse parameter that I would have 44% or less of chances.
*Flip situations will be considered between 45% to 55% for both parties, also making a final average just to ensure that this item is in the 50/50 margin in a large sample. (Note some hands that are genuine flips show an oscillation in the hud between 56% and 55% of equity or between 44% and 45% but they will be calculated correctly with detail and screenshots proving except cases of flip coin that block like TT vs AKo for example, but in this case the equity exceeds the threshold of even 56%)
*I will take screenshots of all situations in the hud except for items 1;2;3;4;5 because there is not much need. However, the database will always be available for the purpose of authenticity of the study, free from trends or deviations.
* Total hands won in show dawn item 4 include tie hands that appear as wins on the HUD and also split equity hands such as 33/33/33/3-handed or 25/25/25/25/4-handed for example. therefore, there may be a discrepancy in the sum of items 6;7;8;9;10 , not matching the total number of hands involving show dawn , so we will use the total sum or crossing of such items among themselves to determine the comparative parameter.
*The most relevant items for research on equity are items: 6;7;8;9;10;11;12;13. Therefore, items: 1;2;3;4;5 will be for personal use or only for purposes of evidence or later use if necessary comparisons.
*New parameters and criteria may be added according to the need of the study, in order to determine and collect data with greater precision and detail, thus being able to add new criteria during the course of the study.
*Flip coins are easier and can be compared with each other in a large sample, having to be as close to 50/50 or the final calculated average.
*The sum of hands without losses and gains + hands won without show dawn + hands lost without show dawn + hands won at show dawn + hands lost at show dawn is = the total number of hands. (for mathematical authenticity purposes) real proof
*The sum of items 4 and 5 minus items 6;7;8;9;10 is equal to item 13.
*The sum of items 4 and 5 minus Item 13 minus item 10 is equal to the comparison ceiling for items 6;7;8;9 or , the sum of items 6;7;8;9 is equal to the ceiling of comparison of the isolated mesos.
*The sum of items *4 and *5 is the total margin of hands for the show dawn, ie 100%. Where inside are all the situations of items 6;7;8;9;10 serving as a ceiling for proportional comparison of the same.
*The sum of items 6;7 is equal to the total number of hands that equity held. as it should.
*The sum of items 8;9 is equal to the total number of hands that equity was reversed.
*The sum of items 6 and 9 is equal to 100% of the showdans I won (except the flip coins which have to be calculated separately).
*The sum of items 7 and 8 is equal to the show dawns I lost (except the flip coins which have to be calculated separately).
*It is possible to add the number of chips involved in items 8;9, thus being able to describe the amount of chips lost and won in each situation (how much we lose when we are ahead and equity is reversed and how much we gain when we are behind and equity is reversed.
*The street to street equity will also be determined later separately using the same parameters.
