Go all in many opponents just fold. Besides the all in do you prefer 80% 2/3 or half? Do you get more calls with 80% 2/3 or half pot on river?
SPR is a preflop/flop metric and measures if we are committed on the flop. So we have the same commitment thresholds that we did on the flop.Thank you for posting.
River sizing is dependent on many factors- Villain style- Villain range- SPR Stack to Pot Ratio- previous streets of action- purpose of bet value- bluff- combination of both.
As to more calls if you get called less often with bigger bets we want to know how much less often,
I bet 100 get called 60% but bet 500 get called 30% which bet should I make?
Hope this helps
![]()
This is a very good topic to bring up. To me, your river sizing should depend on two main things. First, what is my perceived range/holding compared to my villains range in terms of strength. If I have the nuts and I think villain has a good chance of having 2nd or 3rd nuts then I am betting large on the river thinking they have a hand that they are more willing to call with. If I have the nuts and I think my villain has little I will bet small or if out of position I will even check sometimes thinking any bet villain will fold but maybe if I check here villain will bluff at the pot. Really depends on strong I think villain is. Same goes for bluffs, if I think villain is weak and I am bluffing I will make a bet (usually half pot as that is perceived as a value bet) but if I think villain is at least somewhat strong and Im weak then Im giving up. Try to scale your hand strength vs your villains strength and you will get a gauge on how much you can bet. The goal of course it to not cross the inflection point of folding (unless we are bluffing) and bet the most we can while still getting a call.
Second is villain type. The more call station they are the more we can bet when betting for value and the opposite when we are bluffing. The nittier the villain is post flop the less we have to bet to still get a crying call from them.
I use a chart in my head thats like a punnett square. I have call station vs nit and the other axis is how strong my hand vs villains is. Example is villain is call station and I have a strong hand that is just stronger than theirs... in this case we can bet huge since we think they are strong but weaker than us and will call a lot.
Effective stack size comes into play too but I think your question is stemming more from deep stack situations and not situations where you are closer to being pot committed.
This is a very good topic to bring up. To me, your river sizing should depend on two main things. First, what is my perceived range/holding compared to my villains range in terms of strength. If I have the nuts and I think villain has a good chance of having 2nd or 3rd nuts then I am betting large on the river thinking they have a hand that they are more willing to call with. If I have the nuts and I think my villain has little I will bet small or if out of position I will even check sometimes thinking any bet villain will fold but maybe if I check here villain will bluff at the pot. Really depends on strong I think villain is. Same goes for bluffs, if I think villain is weak and I am bluffing I will make a bet (usually half pot as that is perceived as a value bet) but if I think villain is at least somewhat strong and Im weak then Im giving up. Try to scale your hand strength vs your villains strength and you will get a gauge on how much you can bet. The goal of course it to not cross the inflection point of folding (unless we are bluffing) and bet the most we can while still getting a call.
Second is villain type. The more call station they are the more we can bet when betting for value and the opposite when we are bluffing. The nittier the villain is post flop the less we have to bet to still get a crying call from them.
I use a chart in my head thats like a punnett square. I have call station vs nit and the other axis is how strong my hand vs villains is. Example is villain is call station and I have a strong hand that is just stronger than theirs... in this case we can bet huge since we think they are strong but weaker than us and will call a lot.
Effective stack size comes into play too but I think your question is stemming more from deep stack situations and not situations where you are closer to being pot committed.
Thank you for posting.
River sizing is dependent on many factors- Villain style- Villain range- SPR Stack to Pot Ratio- previous streets of action- purpose of bet value- bluff- combination of both.
As to more calls if you get called less often with bigger bets we want to know how much less often,
I bet 100 get called 60% but bet 500 get called 30% which bet should I make?
Hope this helps
![]()
SPR is a preflop/flop metric and measures if we are committed on the flop. So we have the same commitment thresholds that we did on the flop.