The Value of Suited vs. Offsuit Hands

[Gilead]

Suited hands have more equity and playability. How much does that influence your decision to play or fold a hand?

 

[MK_]

Well are we talking J2s or AKs🤔.... but yeah suited adds a bit of value👍

 

[s0ftdumps]

I'll play A-9 or K-10 suited but not unsuited in many positions

 

[Bhargav]

suited connected hands > any unsuited cards
ATs+, KTs+,QTs+,JTs, > AK

 

[oriole]

Suited hands have slightly more equity due to the potential for flushes, but the difference is often marginal. The real influence on my decision to play or fold depends more on position, opponents, and overall hand strength rather than just being suited.

 

[Alex Houngan]

In practice, suited hands generally have better equity and playability post-flop due to their potential to make flushes, which can be very profitable in deep-stacked situations. However, when playing with a short stack and facing an all-in decision, the difference between suited and offsuit hands becomes less significant, as raw hand strength matters more than playability. That said, if you are going to play suited hands, they are much stronger when they include an ace, as they allow you to make the nut flush.
Personally, I think many players overvalue suited hands, especially weak ones, which can lead to trouble when dominated by better flushes. While suited hands add some equity, they should not be the main reason for playing a hand—position, stack size, and opponent tendencies are often more important.

 

[Huntre]

In practice, suited hands generally have better equity and playability post-flop due to their potential to make flushes, which can be very profitable in deep-stacked situations. However, when playing with a short stack and facing an all-in decision, the difference between suited and offsuit hands becomes less significant, as raw hand strength matters more than playability. That said, if you are going to play suited hands, they are much stronger when they include an ace, as they allow you to make the nut flush.
Personally, I think many players overvalue suited hands, especially weak ones, which can lead to trouble when dominated by better flushes. While suited hands add some equity, they should not be the main reason for playing a hand—position, stack size, and opponent tendencies are often more important.

overall, don't trust in suited cards, no matter of what?
Anyone has a couple of numbers, because "slight" and "little" far away from right understanding of whole picture about strength of hand

 

[martDdart]

With potodds at least five to one I play them both preflop.

 

[dorsk]

While suited cons are good hands in position they don’t bear must value off position. In fact they can lose big if they hit one pair. Calling off position has a negative expected value and thus the suited cons should be folded. Limping is of course not a viable option.

 

[TeUnit]

I think suited cards add about 3% to 4% expected equity.

 

[SPANKYSN]

Poker is a game that takes several factors into consideration for estimating success, and math is one of them. The additional roughly 3% advantage of suited vs. unsuited cards should be used in conjunction with position, stack size and reading opponents.

 

[Kenzie 96]

I think it was Samuel Johnson, or maybe Doyle Brunson who said; " The road to hell is paved with 3 to 4% expected equity". Tread carefully down that path.

 

[enno]

suited connected hands > any unsuited cards
ATs+, KTs+,QTs+,JTs, > AK

If you are saying that AKs > AK then you are correct but AK beats many of the other hands so there has to be a lot more thought in your decision. You have to consider position and your opponents to a large degree.

 

[Bhargav]

If you are saying that AKs > AK then you are correct but AK beats many of the other hands so there has to be a lot more thought in your decision. You have to consider position and your opponents to a large degree.

yes I told about post flop playability. in cash tables yes you are correct, players and position matters. but in tourneys dynamics change for every table and blinds increase, they don't matter much. just wait for the right cards (if suited better) then boom !!!

If you check EV chart, suited hands have more EV. Simple.

 

[enno]

yes I told about post flop playability. in cash tables yes you are correct, players and position matters. but in tourneys dynamics change for every table and blinds increase, they don't matter much. just wait for the right cards (if suited better) then boom !!!

If you check EV chart, suited hands have more EV. Simple.

In your original post you didn’t say it was preflop or postflop. The ev charts preflop support what I stated (eg. AKs beats AK in the same positions, but AK beats ATs in the same positions). Postflop is a different story.

 

[Poker Orifice]

Suited hands have more equity and playability. How much does that influence your decision to play or fold a hand?

'It depends'

 

[Like2Play2]

Of course depending on position and the size of the blinds; I do tend to play suited hands, especially suited connectors.

 

[Poker Orifice]

Suited hands have more equity and playability. How much does that influence your decision to play or fold a hand?

Most poker decisions need to be relative to the situation and to ask such a general question makes it impossible to give anything but a very generalized response. hence 'it depends'

If I didn't know better, your post seems more like an attempt towards platinum.