Which of the styles of play do you think is the most correct ?

[sibkaz]

TAG - Reliable ; Tight-aggressive.
LAG - Maniac ; Loose-aggressive.
Tight-Passive - Rock;
Loose-Passive - Auto Responder.

Tight poker player plays a small number of premium hands,

Loose poker player plays a lot of weak and strong hands with pot odds

Aggressive. Prefers to make his own bets and rearrange the bets of other players at the table.

Passive. Does not risk making his own bets and prefers to play his hands through “check-calls”.

 

[Balou1982]

In my opinion it is easy to say which is the worst player of them - the passive one because @table you have to be active - if your actions put together between check and call in more than 80% of your play then it is easy to control you as a villain on table.

A well-rounded playwise between a solid aggressive and not to tight gameplay is the key i think.

 

[Igor G]

TAG - Reliable ; Tight-aggressive.
LAG - Maniac ; Loose-aggressive.
Tight-Passive - Rock;
Loose-Passive - Auto Responder.

Tight poker player plays a small number of premium hands,

Loose poker player plays a lot of weak and strong hands with pot odds

Aggressive. Prefers to make his own bets and rearrange the bets of other players at the table.

Passive. Does not risk making his own bets and prefers to play his hands through “check-calls”.

Tight-Passive - Rock;
I am most inclined to this option. At least for me, this is the most comfortable style of play.

 

[Sparta77]

Játékstílus... Ez egy nagyon jó téma. Próbálok nem egy stilusban játszani.. Ha jellemezni kellene magam, akkor a feszes és az agresszív

 

[sibkaz]

По моему мнению, легко сказать, кто из них худший игрок — пассивный, потому что за столом вам приходится быть активным. Если ваши действия между чеком и коллом составляют более 80% вашей игры, то вас легко контролировать как злодея за столом.

Я думаю, что ключевым моментом является сбалансированный подход к игре, сочетающий в себе агрессивный и не слишком жесткий геймплей.

Sometimes I met loose-passive players who made me fall into tilt)) I'm with monsters, and he punched me with small connectors... I tried to tear it down, but he's so cunning and the 3BB and 4BB check, but in the end the bank is still his... that I had to run away from him)))

 

[sibkaz]

Плотно-пассивный - Рок;
Я больше всего склоняюсь к этому варианту. По крайней мере для меня это самый комфортный стиль игры.

You have to hide the tight aggressive one somehow... otherwise everyone will stop answering... How often do you turn on bluffs? )

 

[sibkaz]

Játékstílus... Ez egy nagyon jó téma. Попробуйте, например, стильный стиль.. Если вы хотите, чтобы фестивали были агрессивными

Taitovo is aggressive, that's great! Why do you think many people are switching from TAG to LAG? )

 

[thetick33]

TAG - Reliable ; Tight-aggressive.
LAG - Maniac ; Loose-aggressive.
Tight-Passive - Rock;
Loose-Passive - Auto Responder.

Tight poker player plays a small number of premium hands,

Loose poker player plays a lot of weak and strong hands with pot odds

Aggressive. Prefers to make his own bets and rearrange the bets of other players at the table.

Passive. Does not risk making his own bets and prefers to play his hands through “check-calls”.

not sure like this at all....When play ring im gonna play tight aggressive....when playing tournaments is dictated at times by opponents....FIRST thing you need to know is this judge your play by comfort...Meaning to me this is most important it dictates your playing style...You cannot use this style at all times it wont work...You have to be willing to mix up your play you can go in with a plan but really cards and others action are going to dictate your response or should...You should have rules and know when to open up play or if you should when to change styles...I am happiest playing a trapping style but i cant use that at league ill lose and fast by more aggressive players a majority of the time....Is only 20 players also so that matters etc...You have to know when you make moves and why you need to...Using stats can help like pokertracker make you aware of when to make decisions...I have rules that wont work for others based on years upon years of plays and on personal history with what works when etc...So you can choose one of these but you cannot stick with one way to play youll lose more then you win

 

[sibkaz]

не уверен, что это вообще так....Когда играю в ринге, я буду играть тайтово-агрессивно....когда играю в турнирах, это иногда диктуют противники....ПЕРВОЕ, что вам нужно знать, это судить о своей игре по комфорту...Для меня это самое важное, это диктует ваш стиль игры...Вы не можете использовать этот стиль все время, он не сработает...Вы должны быть готовы смешивать свою игру, вы можете пойти с планом, но на самом деле карты и другие действия будут диктовать ваш ответ или должны...У вас должны быть правила и знать, когда открывать игру или, если нужно, когда менять стиль...Я счастливее всего играю в стиле ловушек, но я не могу использовать это в лиге, я проигрываю и быстро более агрессивным игрокам большую часть времени....Также всего 20 игроков, так что это важно и т. д. Вы должны знать, когда вы делаете ходы и почему вам это нужно...Использование статистики может помочь, как pokertracker, дать вам знать, когда принимать решения...У меня есть правила, которые не будут работать для других, основанные на годах игры и на личной истории того, что работает, когда и т. д. Так что вы можете выбрать один из них, но нельзя придерживаться одного способа игры, вы проиграете больше, чем выиграете

How interesting! Your option, a comfortable chameleon? )) And what about the League... it's also interesting) is it like trying to play at a very high level by chance? ) There's also sheer aggression there)))

 

[kunkgreen]

The game of poker almost always tends to benefit aggression.

I don't think there is ONE right way to play. Poker is a game of adaptation...
We generally want to play tighter against aggressive players and more aggressive against tight players.

 

[pentazepam]

In my opinion it is easy to say which is the worst player of them - the passive one because @table you have to be active - if your actions put together between check and call in more than 80% of your play then it is easy to control you as a villain on table.

A well-rounded playwise between a solid aggressive and not to tight gameplay is the key i think.

It's often best to act passive and trap with slowplaying against a bluffing maniac with half a brain that can fold.

Of course, if he starts folding too much you can bluff him off his often weak range.

It's all about exploiting the other players' unbalanced play (since they often don't play perfect GTO).

 

[perrywh]

Every table of players are different! Adjust your play to beat them!

 

[eetenor]

TAG - Reliable ; Tight-aggressive.
LAG - Maniac ; Loose-aggressive.
Tight-Passive - Rock;
Loose-Passive - Auto Responder.

Tight poker player plays a small number of premium hands,

Loose poker player plays a lot of weak and strong hands with pot odds

Aggressive. Prefers to make his own bets and rearrange the bets of other players at the table.

Passive. Does not risk making his own bets and prefers to play his hands through “check-calls”.

Your definition of LAG is incorrect--- LAG and Maniac are not synonymous---Maniacs are all LAG's but not all LAGs are Maniacs.

Loose Aggressive play is GTO play TAG is not LAG is also the better exploit play as well--- after all if your V cannot fold AA post flop why would you not play more hands vs them---Or if you V fold post flop too often again why are you not playing wider than TAG ranges IP.. Same Player who over folds why not build bigger pots preflop by raising more hands IP so you can steal bigger pots?

The key to good LAG play is post flop skills which many people do not work on hard enough---

 

[sibkaz]

Ваше определение LAG неверно — LAG и маньяк не являются синонимами — все маньяки — это LAG, но не все LAG являются маньяками.

Лузовая агрессивная игра - это игра GTO. TAG - это не LAG, это также лучшая эксплуатационная игра. В конце концов, если ваш V не может сбросить AA после флопа, почему бы вам не сыграть больше рук против него? Или если вы слишком часто сбрасываете V после флопа, почему бы вам не играть шире, чем диапазоны IP TAG? Тот же игрок, который делает оверфолд, почему бы не построить более крупные банки на префлопе, рейзя с большим количеством рук IP, чтобы вы могли украсть более крупные банки?

Ключ к хорошей игре на LAG — это навыки игры на постфлопе, над которыми многие люди не работают достаточно усердно.
:не уверен::чудак:

I specially raised this topic))) Everyone is encrypted! ))) Me too))))) I want all of us to read it and come to the conclusion that everything flows from one form to another... I have a trick: first a complete bluff, reveals itself to the smallest detail, shows me everything and starts hammering me) Then I catch them... with remorse! )) Everyone has a great experience! From a half-phrase, the interested person will always make sense...

 

[sibkaz]

The topic of rocking opponents, using small raises, making them fight...)

 

[sibkaz]

For example, I already have a general idea of our Society)... It would be great to share my experience...)

 

[Jean-Guy]

TAG - Reliable ; Tight-aggressive.
LAG - Maniac ; Loose-aggressive.
Tight-Passive - Rock;
Loose-Passive - Auto Responder.

Tight poker player plays a small number of premium hands,

Loose poker player plays a lot of weak and strong hands with pot odds

Aggressive. Prefers to make his own bets and rearrange the bets of other players at the table.

Passive. Does not risk making his own bets and prefers to play his hands through “check-calls”.

A LAG is rarely a maniac. A LAG is the most difficult foe to play against while it also the most difficult type to master. Midstakes and highstakes you meet the skilled LAG. And he means business. Viscious, volatile and victorious.

 

[Snake2007]

I don't know which style of play is correct, but I have my style of play, relaxed and without stress.

 

[Igor Popadyk]

I think a lot depends on the game of my opponents and I try to adapt to their game, but in any case, an aggressive game is more profitableльная