I recently bought Lucid for 1 month since it has a 30-day money back guarantee (No questions asked) and I was debating with myself if I should create a thread about how I've fiddled with the solver for about a week now and learned absolutely nothing. And unfortunately, the reason is not because my poker knowledge is so vast.I am trying to learn some GTO, but it is a struggle.
And another misconception is, that either we play GTO or we dont. But on one side of the spectrum even something as simple as learning preflop charts is an attempt to play GTO. When we open fold J4o from UGT, we are using GTO strategy. And on the other side of the spectrum no human can play exactly like a solver, because its simply way to complicated and involve to much randomization.I think there is a misconception about GTO that it is only has value for higher stakes games. We've all heard the "but no one plays like the solvers in my games" argument. Here's the thing though; if you don't know what you're supposed to do from a game theory point of view, how are you supposed to know how you need to adjust to exploit your opponents mistakes?
we play freerolls and micro stakes poker, I don't even have a toolbox much less want to learn GTO to put in it.I'll admit that I've never even tried to learn GTO as part of my toolbox for playing poker. For a recreational player like myself, is it worth it to study GTO?
![]()
most already play GTO in our forum games, just bet and "Guess The Outcome".
So I gave no answer to the thread question with this view on GTO.Great analysis of this theoretical idea.
GTO = Game Theory optimal, is about theory which is not what is played by people.
The opposite is what is really played by people, the practical game.
My opinion on that is if we play against machines that play GTO we have to play GTO.
If we play against humans, we have to play GPO=Game Practical Optimized regardless if you are a recreational or whatever kind of pro you are.
Game Theory Optimal balances a lot around bluffs, they are part of the game, but most big pots come from solid preflop and position play and good
flop decisions and not from Guess The Outcome.
I'm recreational player and I enjoy playing poker because it relaxes me. I play only when I have free time and have no aspiration of becoming a pro. Now, with that said, for myself, I don't think studying GTO would be beneficial (given the free time etc etc).I'll admit that I've never even tried to learn GTO as part of my toolbox for playing poker. For a recreational player like myself, is it worth it to study GTO?
![]()
it is valuable to know, what GTO strategy is, so that you can make more informed decisions about deviating from it. Like "usually this hand is a call to a 3-bet from that position, but I think, the population is under 3-betting, so I will foldDepends on your goals. If you are trying to win money, it is valuable to know, what GTO strategy is, so that you can make more informed decisions about deviating from it. Like "usually this hand is a call to a 3-bet from that position, but I think, the population is under 3-betting, so I will fold". Rather than "hmm I think, he probably has it, so I fold". With that being said a more old school approach without the use of solvers as the one presented in CCs 30-day course will take you pretty far in micro and low stakes games.