Celebrate 20 Years of CardsChat with us! Over $3000 in freerolls, bonuses, and merchandise giveaways; click here to get in on the action!
That's the fun thing about poker, as players we can do our own research. As far as I can tell the greatest influx of players coming to the party, whether it's online or live, in my region anyway, is late afternoon to early evening. I compare that to the number of players I see regularly during the day. I can determine that most of the players are recreational-reg's. These players may not be "pros", necessarily, but they aren't necessarily fish either.Today I saw a question here, which raised this doubt. Is there any study or research on how many players just play for fun and how many are, say, regulars?
I have not heard anything about such a study, but this information is really interesting. Personally, I play for fun, but I play regularlyToday I saw a question here, which raised this doubt. Is there any study or research on how many players just play for fun and how many are, say, regulars?
I play to win! And I'm not ashamed to say that, on the contrary. As far as possible I try to study and improve my game day by day.Ninguém vai admitir que está jogando para ganhar 😏. muitos dirão que jogam para se divertir mas quando não der certo vão postar bad beats🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
In my opinion it is difficult to establish the amount, many people start playing with the illusion of earning easy money, others as fun/hobby and some as professionals, I started playing between 13 and 15 years old, today I am 68 years old, I play all every day and two or three times a month I go to a poker house, in my case it's funToday I saw a question here, which raised this doubt. Is there any study or research on how many players just play for fun and how many are, say, regulars?
When you think of a population in terms of action, you know the number of people who can or cannot perform a certain action, I think that would be important.It seems unneeded. What purpose would it be complex data for? Although no one is prevented from doing such a study.
I've never meet such a statement here (which is a officially) - just opinions...Today I saw a question here, which raised this doubt. Is there any study or research on how many players just play for fun and how many are, say, regulars?
Hi. Would you be stereotyping players based on their playing frequency with a particular playing style? There are 4 basic playing styles which are · Loose Aggressive (LAG) · Tight Aggressive (TAG) · Loose Passive (Calling Station) · Tight Passive (Rock). A regular player which plays frequently or one who plays for fun & doesn't play frequently can use any or all of these styles from game to game or even within the game so it would be a difficult correlation to associate any player to a particular action just based on their frequency of play thus seems unnecessary to me just to know how many players play for fun or are regulars in any situation.When you think of a population in terms of action, you know the number of people who can or cannot perform a certain action, I think that would be important.