I think the exact opposite, for me SNGs are tedious and boring. Cash games are the real deal where you win or lose it's money!I think SNGS are more exciting! and a little harder.... with all tryharders, antes, blinds growing up, many players, etc
in the cashe you need to hunt for fish, then it will be a plus. mtt is better in terms of bankroll, if it has flown out, then you don't want to go back to mtt, you won't fall into a tilt, unlike cash. but in mtt, you can win back a few hours, and not get into prizes or get into small ones.cash games , they are more profitable than tournaments. A sit n go or mtt will take hours (3-8 hours) to something better, but a cash game may give you the opportunity to win more in a short time compared to mtt
yes, unfortunately this kind of poker is dying. more and more are switching to mt. although sng is convenient and fast, and you get pleasure from poker.СНГ — это здорово, просто сейчас их труднее найти.
Since I learned to play cash, I haven't played sit & go anymore.Cash Games or Sit n' go's? Which do you prefer?
Let's talk tell us about your experience, I believe that if we're honest we have a lot of demands on each other.
now there is an opinion that the cache is dying at large limits, there are more and more regulars sitting there who are throwing chips among themselves, and fewer and fewer chips... there are still a lot of fish on micro limits. but the chips will never end at micro limits, and it doesn't matter what discipline))Since I learned to play cash, I haven't played sit & go anymore.
I think that if you want to make a more stable bankroll, and especially if you are a good tournament player, sit & go is a good way to make a bankroll, in fact there are colleagues here who have done it.
You have to know how to play cash, although if you get better at it and get a good return, I think it will also help you play tournaments.
The great cash players first were great tournament players later, such as Doyle Brunson, Phil Hellmuth, Damian Salas, among many more.
Greetings