What Is Your Win @ SD %?

[blueskies]

Previously, before my computer crashed, I had between 22k and 23k hands tracked for the past year (The free HUD I use only has history for 365 days). I went to showdown 35% of the time and won 66% of showdowns. These hands only include ones I played on my computer and excludes the hands I played on my cellphone as there's no tracking ability there.

After my computer crashed and the data was wiped clean, I have played a bit over 1000 hands and the percentages are 33% and 52% respectively, so I've gone to showdown less but am winning at a significantly lower rate.

What are your WSD and $WSD rates?

Wondering if I was just running good before and am back to a normal SD win rate now

 

[Aballinamion]

Previously, before my computer crashed, I had between 22k and 23k hands tracked for the past year (The free HUD I use only has history for 365 days). I went to showdown 35% of the time and won 66% of showdowns. These hands only include ones I played on my computer and excludes the hands I played on my cellphone as there's no tracking ability there.

After my computer crashed and the data was wiped clean, I have played a bit over 1000 hands and the percentages are 33% and 52% respectively, so I've gone to showdown less but am winning at a significantly lower rate.

What are your WSD and $WSD rates?

Wondering if I was just running good before and am back to a normal SD win rate now

I think you shouldn’t worry about this stats until you have played at least one million hands.

 

[georgi krastev]

Here is my minus:

 

[Station_Master]

I think you shouldn’t worry about this stats until you have played at least one million hands.

Even 20k is a reasonable sample as blueskies will have seen a lot of showdowns.

Winning 66% of showdowns is way too high, just over 50% seems about right. If you win 66% of the time you are not value betting thinly enough (I.e. getting some folds and not contributing to the stat) and not bluffing enough ( and getting called sometimes) , I.e. its indicative of overly passive play.

 

[Station_Master]

My win at showdown is about 52% or so from memory

 

[Station_Master]

I recommend not concerning yourself with these statistics until you've accumulated at least one million hands of play.

So just continue to play bad poker for 1 million hands and go broke?

Even with 20k hands it's clear the OP is too nitty and needs to bluff more

 

[AdamasDate]

He is correct 20k isn't a large enough sample in one year

 

[Station_Master]

He is correct 20k isn't a large enough sample in one year

Of course more hands would be better, but poker is a game of incomplete information, we use what data we have to improve our strategy. I find the idea of waiting till you have 1 million hands before looking at the data ridiculous.

 

[AdamasDate]

Nah that too many hands maybe 200k hands is a fair enough sample size a million hands Is just bananas lol