PLO 2nl

L

luiswiz123

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 31, 2021
Total posts
32
Chips
33
what do you think about omaha? I usually play mtt's and spins, but time to time, I like to play a cash table, I mix between omaha and NLH. They say in PLO variance is bigger but win rate could be more in long term if you are good, because there are too much recreational players. They say is because you can have so many outs, it makes more atractive for bad players to keep paying and pursuing marginal draws.
 
pentazepam

pentazepam

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Total posts
2,564
Awards
4
SE
Chips
1,108
The rake becomes pretty brutal at low stakes when equities run close and almost nobody folds preflop if they have limped or raised.
 
Liedust

Liedust

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Aug 19, 2019
Total posts
398
Awards
2
AR
Chips
278
I love omaha... I agree that there are more fish, but sometimes the imbalance is greater and there is less hand control. greetings and good hands
 
ScooperNova

ScooperNova

Hair in a Biscuit
Loyaler
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Total posts
2,501
Awards
3
US
Chips
543
I don't like saying variance is bigger. That is what everyone says though, even pros and coaches. The reality is, margins are just smaller. At the same time, you will get bigger pots more often. Variance may have a chance to rear it's ugly head more often due to these factors, yet variance is variance is variance. It's the smaller equity margins that lead to bigger swings and getting it in more often. And you are right, recreationals and gamblers love omaha. It's action baby. Lots of people who are considered good actually have very little experience. There just aren't that many great PLO player. I see pros making horrible plays and they think it's stellar. Great omaha players have seen 10s of thousands of hands. Another factor to consider is there won't be many bots. People aren't using solvers and RTA as much and if they do it just isn't as effective. PLO8 is king.
 
MK_

MK_

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Sep 14, 2022
Total posts
1,692
US
Chips
906
I like Omaha more than holdem, specifically pl08, Cash or sometimes tourneys are what I play

The variance is bigger, the action is also bigger, there do seem to be more players who don't have a clue, fun times, enjoy😎
 
Kinalha

Kinalha

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
May 2, 2020
Total posts
1,480
Awards
2
BR
Chips
269
what do you think about omaha? I usually play mtt's and spins, but time to time, I like to play a cash table, I mix between omaha and NLH. They say in PLO variance is bigger but win rate could be more in long term if you are good, because there are too much recreational players. They say is because you can have so many outs, it makes more atractive for bad players to keep paying and pursuing marginal draws.
NL2/PLO2 it's the same thing about fishs/regs, what i can tell you abouth omaha is: still lucrative until PLO25 untill now i'm still playing, before these limit i can't say so much, but have much more regs, at least in GGPoker. Another day i play a little bit in stars, and for me is a small field with more regs, so i don't like so much
 
julio gonzalez

julio gonzalez

Visionary
Bronze Level
Joined
Nov 30, 2019
Total posts
600
Awards
1
Chips
78
Hello after Texas Holdem Omaha is the poker game that I like the most and every day I play a tournament
 
julio gonzalez

julio gonzalez

Visionary
Bronze Level
Joined
Nov 30, 2019
Total posts
600
Awards
1
Chips
78
I would like CC to play more Omaha games
 
C

canbora

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 4, 2006
Total posts
135
Awards
1
Chips
76
I suppose Ill toss in my two cents. Im sure, logically there is HUGE reason to play this and I'm sure there is plenty of money to be made. It just involves training an education.

Me?.. I cant wrap my hand around all of the serious and extreme math. Theres far too many variance and possibilies. And smaller stakes people play faster. Higher stakes people player slower. Its too many dang numbers to keep track of , let alone PLO5
 
O

odonob

Visionary
Platinum Level
Joined
Feb 16, 2020
Total posts
884
Awards
1
Chips
434
PLO variance is such that the recreational players makes no difference. You will just get sucked out more often as the river hits quite a bit bigger than in Texas Holdem. Far more straights and flushes. You will not get an edge. It’s much harder as more player do and will hit more often with greater ranges. A lot of small value cards will have more luck hitting the boards. A lot more random full houses too. In fact worse players will hit more often because if the format of the game.
 
C

canbora

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 4, 2006
Total posts
135
Awards
1
Chips
76
PLO variance is such that the recreational players makes no difference. You will just get sucked out more often as the river hits quite a bit bigger than in Texas Holdem. Far more straights and flushes. You will not get an edge. It’s much harder as more player do and will hit more often with greater ranges. A lot of small value cards will have more luck hitting the boards. A lot more random full houses too. In fact worse players will hit more often because if the format of the game.
I suppose this is the old argument of like how some people argue that games are too soft and everyone is always in. The way I always try to find an answer for things is I take things to an extreme and I back them off. I think that six Max pot limit Omaha cash is basically the example of this. And is actually the reason why it is pot limit and not 9/10-handed, because that in fact would be exactly what it is. Literally everyone would be in. If literally everyone is in or near so, it's basically just an all-in heads up match. It then becomes luck and there's no skill involved
 
antonis32123

antonis32123

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Total posts
6,733
Awards
20
GR
Chips
392
Nowadays I play plo 1c-2c just for fun very rarely . The only good with Omaha is that you get a lot of action , prefloop and post flop . The bad thing for me is that I haven't beaten this game at this stake . But it's fun to play sometimes , late at night .
 
P

pauloandre100

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 10, 2018
Total posts
235
Awards
1
Chips
10
PLO is easier than NLH. Players play more marginal hands in PLO when compared to NLH. So, they make more mistakes in the PLO than in the NHL.

1716220953627
 
B

bababooey

Rock Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Jan 20, 2023
Total posts
155
Awards
1
GB
Chips
128
I feel there are a lot more players at PLO who are there for the thrills and gambling as opposed to NLH.

This naturally increases the variance but if you can find a good table then it should be beatable.

With PLO the variance will be higher so the bankroll must take this into account.
 
M

Manf1

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Apr 22, 2023
Total posts
158
BR
Chips
199
what do you think about omaha? I usually play mtt's and spins, but time to time, I like to play a cash table, I mix between omaha and NLH. They say in PLO variance is bigger but win rate could be more in long term if you are good, because there are too much recreational players. They say is because you can have so many outs, it makes more atractive for bad players to keep paying and pursuing marginal draws.
I dont recommend to play nl2 omaha, most of the people going to see flops and can be brutal for your mindset to call many hands
 
Top