S
sitingman
Enthusiast
Silver Level
Andyreas
Moderator
Moderator
I guess it depends on the stakes and if you can afford losing or not. Additional if you're tilting easily or not.
When you play within your bankroll/budget, which you should always do, then it's probably indeed a bad move to pay the fee in the long run.
If the money matters that much to you or you tilt easily, then you can cash out IMO.
I also don't use the cashout feature but also not a regular cash player.
When you play within your bankroll/budget, which you should always do, then it's probably indeed a bad move to pay the fee in the long run.
If the money matters that much to you or you tilt easily, then you can cash out IMO.
I also don't use the cashout feature but also not a regular cash player.
Jean-Guy
Rock Star
Silver Level
I play strictly cash games and never use the cash out function as well as I never use the Run it Twice function. But I do understand players who do. People have different reasons to do what they do. But if I see a player with tilt issues cashes out this is to be used in future playing as information. And as we know poker is a game of incomplete information, one should use any information possible.
G
gustav197poker
Legend
Bronze Level
If you have 70% equity, your V would have likely needed to cash out and you not, since you had a made hand and not a draw. It changes if the value expectation was against you, but that's another question.
S
sitingman
Enthusiast
Silver Level
Its not the stakes for me, its getting rid of the variance, I would have to play the same hand thousands of times in order to achieve the Ev, the cash out option seems like you take the average result at a small fee and therefore don't have to play large volumes but alot of people seem to think its bad so maybe I will reconsider my theory!
S
sitingman
Enthusiast
Silver Level
I prefer to take the cashout when I am ahead to bank the profit, harder to accept the loss. Not sure why it would matter if you are ahead or behind though?
G
gustav197poker
Legend
Bronze Level
I guess to minimize losses.
Suns of Beaches
Ripley rips it in on Replay
Platinum Level
I thought that for quite a long time too but maybe there are spots where a cashout could be a good decision?
For example: we have 1 out and only the river left. Would u still not cashout in this spot?
john_entony
Legend
Platinum Level
I almost always withdraw money before river if my chances to win are not more than 80%. I think that 1% is a normal fee for stable money without nerves. Especially if a fish playing against me, who calls all my all-inns. 
R.Holynskyi
Visionary
Platinum Level
E
EarnDAStack
Visionary
Platinum Level
You should never be cashing out. Poker is a game with narrow edges that narrow even further as you move up in stakes. That 1% will add up to be a significant amount of your profit over a long timeline which is how decisions in poker are supposed to be made, on an infinite timeline.
If you're feeling stressed out about losing a stack after going all in it probably suggests that you're playing at a stake where you're uncomfortable dealing with the variance associated with poker. The emotional weight of the money is causing you to make poor strategic poker decisions as giving away 1% of a pot you're going to win 70% of the time because the 30% of the time you lose you'll feel bad isn't a business decision it's an emotional one.
The mental game of poker is just as challenging as the strategic aspect of the game.
GL
EDS
If you're feeling stressed out about losing a stack after going all in it probably suggests that you're playing at a stake where you're uncomfortable dealing with the variance associated with poker. The emotional weight of the money is causing you to make poor strategic poker decisions as giving away 1% of a pot you're going to win 70% of the time because the 30% of the time you lose you'll feel bad isn't a business decision it's an emotional one.
The mental game of poker is just as challenging as the strategic aspect of the game.
GL
EDS